Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Pediatr. 2018 May 10;199:186–193.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.03.074

Table 2.

Comparison of How Various Factors Influence Recommendations to Families

Pediatric Surgeons Neonatologists p-value
My experience with long-term survival of infants with minimal residual small bowel 0.83
Very Important 165 (52.2%) 151 (52.4%)
Important 126 (39.9%) 107 (37.2%)
Somewhat Important 21 (6.6%) 29 (10.1%)
Not at all Important 4 (1.3%) 1 (0.3%)
My interpretation of the current literature with regards to long-term outcomes in pediatric short bowel syndrome 0.17
Very Important 134 (42.4%) 133 (46.2%)
Important 147 (46.5%) 135 (46.9%)
Somewhat Important 34 (10.8%) 20 (6.9%)
Not at all Important 1 (0.3%) 0 (0%)
Education on current outcomes in intestinal failure from a conference/Grand Rounds 0.39
Very Important 60 (19.0%) 48 (16.7%)
Important 115 (36.4%) 114 (39.6%)
Somewhat Important 103 (32.6%) 71 (24.7%)
Not at all Important 38 (12.0%) 55 (19.1%)
My experience with the long-term quality of life in children with short bowel syndrome <0.001
Very Important 164 (51.9%) 98 (34.0%)
Important 127 (40.2%) 128 (44.4%)
Somewhat Important 23 (7.2%) 51 (17.7%)
Not at all Important 2 (0.6%) 11 (3.8%)
My view on the potential for success in intestinal transplantation <0.001
Very Important 113 (35.8%) 71 (24.7%)
Important 144 (45.6%) 133 (46.2%)
Somewhat Important 46 (14.6%) 72 (25.0%)
Not at all Important 13 (4.1%) 12 (4.2%)
My knowledge of long term neurodevelopmental outcomes of extreme prematurity and/or short bowel syndrome <0.001
Very Important 115 (36.4%) 151 (52.4%)
Important 151 (47.8%) 110 (38.2%)
Somewhat Important 44 (13.9%) 26 (9.0%)
Not at all Important 6 (1.9%) 1 (0.3%)
My faith or religion 0.71
Very Important 15 (4.7%) 15 (5.2%)
Important 26 (8.2%) 21 (7.3%)
Somewhat Important 46 (14.6%) 39 (13.5%)
Not at all Important 229 (72.5%) 213 (74.0%)
My training 0.31
Very Important 59 (18.7%) 51 (17.7%)
Important 143 (45.3%) 124 (43.1%)
Somewhat Important 74 (23.4%) 63 (21.9%)
Not at all Important 40 (12.7%) 50 (17.4%)
The standard of care at my institution 0.001
Very Important 51 (16.1%) 53 (18.4%)
Important 113 (35.8%) 137 (47.6%)
Somewhat Important 90 (28.5%) 71 (24.7%)
Not at all Important 16 (19.6%) 27 (9.4%)
The infant’s family/social situation 0.13
Very Important 64 (20.3%) 84 (29.2%)
Important 118 (37.3%) 84 (29.2%)
Somewhat Important 68 (21.5%) 69 (24.0%)
Not at all Important 66 (20.9%) 51 (17.7%)