Skip to main content
. 2018 May 21;35(7):1339–1348. doi: 10.1007/s10815-018-1183-8

Table 1.

Demographics of patients in the CS, PESA or TESE treatment groups

CS (n = 27) PESA (n = 29) TESE (n = 37) P value
Female age 34.1 ± 3.9 35.6 ± 5.0 34.6 ± 4.3 NS
AMH (ng/ml) 2.3 ± 1.7 2.6 ± 2.2 2.5 ± 2.1 NS
FSH dose (mIU/ml) 2513 ± 1290 2550 ± 1685 2041 ± 940 NS
Peak estradiol (pg/ml) 2282 ± 1016 1927 ± 1196 2194 ± 1001 NS
No. cycles 1.07 ± 0.27 1.45 ± 0.78 1.49 ± 0.60 0.001b 0.01c
Male age 36.6 ± 7.1 43.7 ± 9.3 39.1 ± 8.2 0.04a 0.001c
Azoospermia diagnosis na 16 s/p vasectomy 6 s/p vasectomy
1 ejaculatory duct obstruction 2 epididymal obstruction
7 CBAVD 1 Klinefelter
5 idiopathic 1 trauma
27 idiopathic
Hormone profile
 LH (mIU/ml) na na 11.1 ± 9.2
 FSH (mIU/ml) 16.4 ± 15.3
 Testosterone (ng/dl) 498.3 ± 284.3

aTESE vs PESA bTESE vs CS cPESA vs C TESE for non-obstructive azoospermia (n = 26). P value < 0.05 considered to be statistically significant