Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul 27;8:11363. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-29766-z

Table 2.

Number and type of outliers for the cerebral cortex and cerebellum defined by the cut-off method.

Brain # N, NRM outliers % of total Median NRM (Am2) N, SIRM outliers
  1 29
  2 31 26 5.66 × 10−11 9
  3 48 40 8.10 × 10−11 4
  4 14 12 6.05 × 10−11 27
  5 54 55 5.73 × 10−11 3
  6 16 14 5.24 × 10−11 15
  7 15 14 10.16 × 10−11 9
TOTAL 178 26 96
  L 96 28 6.18 × 10−11 56
  R 82 25 6.17 × 10−11 40
cc only
  I 10 11 5.93 × 10−11 21
  II 30 19 5.87 × 10−11 32
  III 48 27 6.21 × 10−11 23
  IV 59 39 7.09 × 10−11 9
  1 74 31 6.07 × 10−11 20
  2 53 23 8.36 × 10−11 47
  3 20 18 6.13 × 10−11 18
  a 29 35 9.60 × 10−11 14
  b 27 23 6.58 × 10−11 15
  c 31 24 5.70 × 10−11 17
  d 25 20 7.09 × 10−11 20
  e 23 25 5.92 × 10−11 10
  f 12 32 9.63 × 10−11 9

Abbreviations are: N, number; NRM, natural remanent magnetization; SIRM, saturation isothermal remanent magnetization; cc, cerebral cortex; cb, cerebellum; L, left hemisphere; R, right hemisphere; % of total, number of NRM outliers divided by the total number of measured specimens in a given location (in percent); I–IV, horizontal level; 1–3, sagittal plane; a–f, row. Note that brain #1 had no NRM values so outliers were only based on the SIRM criterion for the cut-off method.