Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2018 May 24;19(8):909–928. doi: 10.1080/14656566.2018.1476492

Table 5.

Other prospective/retrospective studies related to the efficacy of everolimus in NETs

Study, (year) Design n Treatment Primary PFS OS ORR SD
Panzuto (2014) [91] Retro 169 Eve P, GI, L 12 mo 32 mo 8% 68%
Berardi (2017) [92] Retro 116 Eve P 19 mo 44 mo 10% 73%
Liu (2016) [93] Retro 53 Eve P, GI 18.9 mo 63.9 mo 28% 55%
Lee (2017) [94] Retro 47 Eve P 27.5 mo 60.8 mo 19% 66%
Lee (2017) [95] Retro 40 Eve P 20 mo - 0% 65%
Yao (2015) [96] Pro 39 Bv or Eve a
→ Bv + Eve
P, GI, L 14.6 mo 27.9 mo 25% 69%
Kamp (2013) [97] Retro 24 Eve P, GI 13.1 mo - 17% 63%
Angelousi (2017) [98] Retro 21
11
Eve; 1st line
Eve; 2nd line
P
P
16.3 mo
15.5 mo
(2-yr; 83%)
(2-yr; 69%)
-
-
-
-
Yoo (2017) [99] Retro 11
6
Eve
Eve
P
GI
16.6 mo
14.7 mo
Not reached
27.7 mo
9%
17%
73%
83%
Capdevila (2015) [100] Retro 57 Eve + lanreotide P, GI 25.8 mo b 26.4 mo 18% 61%

Bv,bevacizumab; Eve, everolimus,; GI,gastrointestinal; L, lung; NET, neuroendocrine tumor; ORR, objective response rate; OS, overall survival; P, pancreas; PFS,progression free survival; Pro prospective; Retro, retrospective; SD, stable disease.

a

Treated with either agents alone for 3 weeks prior to combination therapy.

b

Reported as TTP (time to progression).