Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul 25;6:e5246. doi: 10.7717/peerj.5246

Table 1. Results from yes/no questions to contractors and surveyors.

Question Contractor responses (n = 51) Surveyor responses (n = 71)
Yes No Yes No
Q1: Was there evidence of defects or structural damage to the residential building caused by the Japanese knotweed? 2% (1) 98% (50) 6% (4) 94% (67)
Q2: Was there evidence of defects or structural damage to retaining garden walls, sheds, garages, greenhouses or lightly built garden structures caused by the Japanese knotweed? 35% (18) 65% (33) 23% (16) 77% (55)
Q3: Was there evidence of defects or structural damage to drains, sewers and other subterranean services caused by the Japanese knotweed? 16% (8) 64% (43) 3% (2) 97% (66)
Q4: Was there evidence of loss of amenity to the garden or grounds resulting from the presence of Japanese knotweed? 51% (26) 49% (21) 18% (13) 82% (55)

Notes:

Results are presented as percentages for easier comparison between contractor and surveyor respondents and rounded to the nearest whole number. The actual number of responses are included in brackets. n = sample size. Three surveyors did not answer the third and fourth questions making n = 68 for those responses (see Supplemental Information S1 for more details).