. 2018 Jul 12;7(14):e008460. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.008460

Table 2.

DCM Versus ICM Study Summary

	Within‐DCM‐Group Changes	Within‐ICM‐Group Changes	Between‐Group Difference
EF	↑^a	NS	P=0.005
SV	↑^b	NS	P=0.02
EDV	NS	↓^b	NS
ESV	↓^b	NS	NS
SI	NS	↓^c	P=0.004
ED mass	NS	↑^a	P=0.0003
6MWT	↑^a	↑^a	NS
NYHA	↓^a	↓^b	NS
MLHFQ	↓^a	↓^b	0.04

6MWT indicates 6‐minute walk test; DCM, dilated cardiomyopathy; ED, end diastolic; EDV, end‐diastolic volume; EF, ejection fraction; ESV, end‐systolic volume; ICM, ischemic cardiomyopathy; MLHFQ, Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire; NS, not significant; NYHA, New York Heart Association; SI, sphericity index; SV, stroke volume.

P=0.001,

P=0.05,

P=0.0001.