Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 26;7(13):e008678. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.008678

Table 4.

Comparison of Accuracy of In‐Hospital Cardiac Arrest Prediction Model With Same Sensitivity Point

TTS Sensitivity Specificity PPV NPV F‐Measure MACHP NRI (95% CI)
MEWS ≥3 63.0 79.9 0.5 99.9 1.0 0.293
DEWS ≥7.1 63.0 87.0 0.8 99.9 1.5 0.199 0.071 (0.061–0.082)
MEWS ≥4 49.3 86.8 0.6 99.9 1.2 0.198
DEWS ≥18.2 49.3 94.6 1.4 99.9 2.8 0.084 0.078 (0.067–0.089)
MEWS ≥5 37.3 90.6 0.6 99.9 1.3 0.143
DEWS ≥52.8 37.3 98.4 3.7 99.9 7.1 0.025 0.079 (0.068–0.090)
SPTTS 60.7 77.0 0.4 99.9 0.8 0.334
DEWS ≥8.0 60.7 88.3 0.8 99.9 1.6 0.180 0.151 (0.138–0.163)
Random forest 75.3 69.9 0.4 99.9 0.8 0.409
DEWS ≥3.0 75.3 77.0 0.5 99.9 1.0 0.354 0.071 (0.060–0.082)
Logistic regression 76.3 34.6 0.2 99.9 0.4 0.622
DEWS ≥2.9 75.7 76.5 0.5 99.9 1.0 0.360 0.413 (0.399–0.427)

CI indicates confidence interval; DEWS, deep learning–based early warning system score; MACHP, mean alarm count per hour per patient; MEWS, modified early warning score; NPV, negative predictive value; NRI, net reclassification index; PPV, positive predictive value; SPTTS, single‐parameter track‐and‐trigger system; TTS, track‐and‐trigger system.