Abstract
Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is an autoimmune neuroinflammatory disease. In contrast to multiple sclerosis, autoantibodies against aquaporin-4 (AQP4) expressed on astrocytic end-feet have been exclusively detected in sera of NMOSD patients. Several lines of evidence suggested that anti-AQP4 autoantibodies are pathogenic, but the mechanism triggering inflammation, impairment of astrocyte function, and the role of neutrophils presented in NMOSD cerebrospinal fluid remains unknown. In this study, we tested how human neutrophils affect astrocytes in the presence of anti-AQP4 Ab-positive serum derived from NMOSD patients. An in vitro model of inflammation consisted of human astrocyte line, NMOSD serum, and allogenic peripheral blood neutrophils from healthy individuals. We showed evidence of pathogenicity of NMOSD serum, which by consecutive action of anti-AQP4 Abs, complement system, and neutrophils affected astrocyte function. Anti-AQP4 Ab binding astrocytes initiated two parallel complementary reactions. The first one was dependent on the complement cytotoxicity via C5b-9 complex formation, and the second one on the reverse of astrocyte glutamate pump into extracellular space by C5a-preactivated neutrophils. As a consequence, astrocytes were partially destroyed; however, a major population of astrocytes polarized into proinflammatory cells which were characterized by pathological glutamate removal from extracellular space.
Keywords: astrocytes, neutrophils, complement system, glutamate, neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder
Introduction
Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is a central nervous system (CNS) inflammatory autoimmune illness characterized by medullary and/or optical nerve damage leading to paralysis and blindness (1). For many years, NMOSD was believed to be a rare variant of multiple sclerosis (MS). In contrast to MS, autoantibodies against aquaporin-4 (anti-AQP4 Ab), a water channel densely expressed on astrocytic end-feet, have been detected in the majority of NMOSD cases, providing evidence of an autoimmune character of this disease and suggesting the need for another treatment approach (2). In addition, a specific profile of serum peptide reactivity to human antigens might be helpful in differentiating NMOSD and MS (3).
Recently, two different hypotheses explaining the consequences of anti-AQP4 Ab binding astrocytes were proposed (4). The first one highlighted the role of complement system activation during anti-AQP4 Ab binding which assumed that after crossing or direct at the blood–brain barrier (BBB), anti-AQP4–IgG binds extracellular conformation domains of aquaporin-4 (AQP4) and activates classical complement cascade causing deposition of the membrane attack complex C5b-9 into astrocyte cell membrane (5–9). Another theory postulated that anti-AQP4–IgG binding might affect astrocyte metabolism leading to disruption of their ability to neutralize extracellular glutamate. High extracellular concentration of glutamate is cytotoxic for CNS (10). Astrocytes are the major cells that regulate extracellular glutamate concentration, downregulating it, when it is briefly increased at glutamergic synapses and maintaining low extracellular level at rest (11).
Another aspect of anti-AQP4–IgG binding astrocytes deserving consideration is represented by functional changes of affected astrocytes that result in reactive astrocytosis. Astrocytes were shown to undergo various alterations in response to different types of injuries or diseases at morphological and biochemical levels (12). Reactive astrocytes are considered to be a cellular component of resident innate immune system in the CNS, which stand on guard protecting against microbial infections (13). Furthermore, activated astrocytes were shown to express and secrete chemokines and cytokines which might promote the recruitment of peripheral immune cells (14).
Although it has long been known that neutrophils are present in NMOSD CNS lesions and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), their role in NMOSD pathogenesis has not been determined (15–17). Complement-dependent granulocyte recruitment through BBB as a result of anti-AQP4 Ab binding astrocytes has been described in in vitro experiments (6). In mouse models of NMOSD, the extent of CNS tissue damage correlated with neutrophil infiltration, and inhibition of neutrophil protease reduced anti-AQP4 Ab-induced brain tissue damage (18, 19).
In this study, we tested how neutrophils contributed to the NMOSD pathogenesis, providing evidence of their direct involvement in dysregulation of astrocyte function by mediating the formation of reactive astrocytes which possessed proinflammatory capacity and impaired glutamate metabolism.
Patients and Methods
Patients
All participants of the study were diagnosed and recruited at the Department of Neurology, Medical University of Lodz. Seven patients (four females, three males; aged 45.7) were diagnosed with NMOSD, fulfilling the 1999 Wingerchuk criteria for NMOSD (20). All the patients had optic nerve and spinal cord inflammation, none of them had brain magnetic resonance imaging that fulfilled Barkhof/Tintore criteria for MS, all were anti-AQP4 autoantibody positive (21). CSF and peripheral blood were collected at 3.4 ± 2.33 months from the first relapse. Two groups of patients were recruited as the controls. The first one constituted of the patients with remitting–relapsing multiple sclerosis (RRMS), diagnosed according to the McDonald criteria (22), representing neurodegenerative disease mainly dependent on autoreactive T lymphocytes. For NMOSD and RRMS, a relapse episode was defined as the appearance of new neurological signs or worsening of pre-existing signs after at least 30 days of clinical stability, while remission as a clinical stability for more than 3 months after the relapse. Both NMOSD and RRMS patients were seronegative for myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (anti-MOG) autoantibodies. The second control group constituted of the patients with other neurological disorders (OND) characterized by negative medical history for autoimmune and infectious diseases. Eight patients that have been qualified to OND group suffered from headache and were negative for recognition of infectious meningitis and brain inflammation with negative clinical and CSF laboratory criteria: normal values of glucose (60–75% of serum concentration), total protein (0.15–0.45 g/L), Cl− (117 mmol/L), and lactic acid (<2.1 mmol/L). All patients were treatment-naïve, none received systemic steroids or other anti-inflammatory drugs for at least 3 months before the study. The patients in the control groups were age and gender matched. Mean age was 43.2 and 41.5 for RRMS and OND patients, respectively. 2 mL of CSF, 10 mL of whole blood on lithium heparin anticoagulant, and 5 mL without anticoagulant were derived from all patients during routine testing. Six age- and gender-matched healthy volunteers were recruited to the study. 10 mL of whole blood on lithium heparin anticoagulant has been collected form each healthy control (HC).
The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Medical University of Lodz (RNN/44/14/KE), and informed consent was obtained from each participant of the study.
Detection of Anti-AQP4 and Anti-MOG Serum Autoantibodies
Detection of serum anti-AQP4 and anti-MOG autoantibodies was done using Indirect Immunofluorescence Kits (Euroimmune, Lübeck, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instruction.
Multiple Profiling Chemokine Assays
Concentrations of chemokines and cytokines in CSF were measured using Bio-Plex Pro™ Human Chemokine Assays (Bio-Rad Laboratories). To analyze reactivity of astrocytes exposed to CSF and neutrophils, concentration of 27 pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines was measured in supernatants using Human Cytokine Group I Assays. All reagents and technology were provided by Bio-Rad Laboratories (Bio-Plex 200). Analysis was performed according to the manufacturer’s recommendations. Briefly, standards and samples were diluted (1:4) in sample diluent and transferred to the plate containing magnetic beads and incubated for 1 h at room temperature (RT). Next, the plate was washed (3×), and detection antibody was added for 30 min on shaker (850 rpm) at RT. Next, the plate was washed (3×), and streptavidin-PE solution was added for 10 min. After incubation, plate was washed (3×), and samples were resuspended in 125 µL of assay buffer and analyzed within 15 min. All samples were analyzed at the same time in duplicate wells.
ELISA
C5a and glutamate were measured in CSF and supernatants using ELISA Kits (LifeSpan Biosciences and Abnova). The detection limit was 31.25 pg/mL for C5a and 0.3 µg/mL for glutamate. According to the manufacturer’s information, glutamate cross-reactivity with factors present in the culture media and CSF (glutamine, glycine, alanine, and 5-aminovaleric acid) was less than 0.01%. All samples were analyzed in duplicate.
Lactate Dehydrogenase (LDH) Release Assay
Lactate dehydrogenase release was measured by colorimetric method using the Cytotoxicity Detection Kit (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA; Roche) according to the manufacturer’s instruction. Concentration of LDH released from astrocytes lysed with Triton X-100 solution (final concentration 1%) was used as the positive control (100% of cell lysis). Supernatant from astrocytes supplemented with 10% PBS was used as a negative control (spontaneous LDH release). The rate of lysed cells was calculated based on the normalization of each sample to the level of LDH released by positive and negative controls samples. All samples were analyzed in duplicate.
Neutrophil Isolation
Neutrophils were isolated on Polymorphprep™ (Axis Shield) according to the manufacturer’s instruction. Purity and viability of isolated neutrophils was ~97% (Figure S1A in Supplementary Material).
Adhesion Molecule Expression and Functional Tests of Neutrophils
In Vitro Study
Adhesion molecule expression, phagocytosis, and reactive oxygen intermediate (ROI) production were measured in neutrophils isolated form HCs after incubation with CSF for 30 min in 37°C. Unconjugated anti-C5a (1 µg/mL, clone 2942; Thermo Fisher Scientific) and mouse IgG2aκ (eBioscience™) as isotype control mAbs were used for neutralizing experiments.
Ex Vivo Study
Adhesion molecule expression, phagocytosis, and ROI production were measured within 30 min in freshly drowned neutrophils from NMOSD, RRMS, and OND patients.
CD11b, CD18, and CD62L Expression
3 × 106 cells/mL suspended in PBS were incubated at RT with conjugated monoclonal antibodies: anti-CD11b PE (ICRF44, BD), CD18-FITC (L130, BD), and CD62L-PE (SK11, BD). After 30 min of incubation, samples were washed in PBS, fixed with 1% paraformaldehyde, and analyzed using flow cytometry (BD LSRII, FACSDiva™ analysis software).
Phagocytosis and ROI Production
Ready to use kits were used for analysis of neutrophil phagocytosis and ROI production (Bursttest and Phagoburst, OrphoGen Pharma, Germany). Measurements of peripheral blood neutrophil function were performed in the whole blood according to the manufacturer’s instruction, whereas experiments, in which CSF effect on neutrophils was analyzed, were performed in isolated cells. Samples were analyzed within 30 min using flow cytometry (BD LSRII, FACSDiva™).
Chemotaxis Assay
Chemotaxis was determined with modified Migratest™ (Orpegen Pharma, Germany). Shortly, CSF was used as the medium contained unknown chemotaxis factors. Freshly isolated HC neutrophils were incubated in upper chamber (cell cultured insert with 3.0 µm ϕ) immersed in CSF (low chamber) for 30 min in 37°C. Neutrophils that have migrated through cell culture insert toward CSF or supernatant were labeled with propidium iodate, CD62L-FITC (fluorescein isothiocyanate) (BD) and analyzed within 30 min using flow cytometry (BD LSRII, FACSDiva™). The number of neutrophils was normalized using tubes containing constant number of microbeads (Trucount™, BD). As a positive chemotaxis control, N-formyl-methionyl-leucyl-phenylalanine (2 × 10−6 M) was used. PBS was used as a negative control.
Human Astrocyte Culture
Normal cells derived from human induced neural stem cells (CL 05004-CLTH/astrocytes; Celther Poland, first passage 1 × 106 cells/vial) after thawing under standard conditions were cultured in DMEM High Glucose medium (Sigma-Aldrich) supplemented with 1% fetal bovine serum (Sigma-Aldrich), 1% N2 supplement (Gibco Life Technologies), 100 U/mL penicillin and 0.1 mg/mL streptomycin (Sigma-Aldrich), and 100 ng/mL of BMP-4 supplement (TGFβ superfamily ligand, Merck) in T-25 flask coated by previously prepared Geltrex® LDEV-Free reduced growth factor basement membrane matrix, according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Gibco Life Technologies) at 37°C and 5% CO2 (23). CLTH/astrocyte cultures were monitored everyday under a phase contrast microscope for 7 days with replacing the medium two times per week. For cytokine, C5a, glutamate, LDH release, ICC, and neutrophil chemotaxis assay, CLTH/astrocytes (second passage) were seeded at 2 × 104/100 μL/well in U-bottom microtiter plates (Falcon, Becton Dickinson) and Cell Culture Chamber slide (Nalge Nunc International) coated by previously prepared Geltrex® LDEV-Free reduced growth factor basement membrane matrix (Gibco Life Technologies). Cells were incubated for 24 h at 37°C in humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2 prior exposition to sera. More than 99% of cells were positive for glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), a specific marker for astrocytes (Figure S1A in Supplementary Material).
Immunocytochemical Analysis
Astrocytes were transferred to gelatin-coated microscope slides by cytospin (300 × g, 10 min) and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 20 min at RT. Fixed cells were washed extensively with PBS and blocked with 10% rabbit normal blocking serum (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) supplemented with 0.3% Triton™ X-100 (Sigma-Aldrich) for 45 min at RT. Next, cells were washed and double-stained for IgG1 with AQP4, C5b-9 with phalloidin, and GFAP with C5b-9. Anti-IgG1/FITC (Dako Cytomation), anti-AQP4 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), anti-C5b-9 (Dako Cytomation), phalloidin (Invitrogen), anti-GFAP (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), and rat IgG2b (Invitrogen), as negative isotype control were used. Secondary fluorescent antibodies [chicken pAb to rabbit Texas Red (TR) (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), goat pAbs to mouse FITC (Abcam), or goat pAbs to mouse TR (Thermo Fisher Scientific)] were added. The membrane localization of C5b-9, IgG1, and GFAP was analyzed by confocal microscopy (Nikon D-Eclipse C1) using EZ-C1 software.
In Vitro Model of Induction of NMOSD Inflammation
Matured astrocytes were cultured as described above. First, anti-AQP4 Ab-positive NMOSD serum (active stage of the disease) was added to astrocyte culture for 1 h (10% v/v). Relapse RRMS or OND sera were used as the controls. Cells were washed and then incubated for 4 h with freshly isolated neutrophils of HCs. Next, neutrophils were removed by anti-CD15 magnetic MicroBeads (Miltenyi Biotec), and astrocytes were washed and cultured for additional 16 h. Supernatants were collected at three time points: baseline, after incubation with serum (1 h), and after incubation with neutrophils (21 h). To visualize astrocyte morphology, cells were cultured on 8-well chamber slides (Nunc International) and analyzed by imaging in DIC microscopy (Zeiss Axiovert 200 inverse microscope with a Zeiss Plan-apochromat 63×/1.43 differential interference contrast objective).
Statistics
A statistical analysis of differences was performed using the one-way ANOVA test. Scheffe’s test was used for multiple comparisons as a post hoc test when statistical significances were identified in the ANOVA test. Statistical significance of differences in ex vivo study of neutrophil function and concentration of chemotaxis agents in CSF was determined by Student’s t-test.
Results
C5a Level Is Increased in the NMOSD CSF
In the first phase of the study, concentrations of all well-documented endogenous chemokines responsible for neutrophil recruitment to the site of inflammation were analyzed. We used multi ELISA method that allowed to analyze many chemotaxis agents in one sample. Surprisingly, the majority of conventional chemotactic factors were not increased neither in the active nor in the remission NMOSD CSF (Table 1). Concentrations of inflammatory induced chemokines, such as ENA-78, Eotaxin-1-3, GRO-α, and GRO-β, were not statistically significantly different in NMOSD compared with both control groups. GCP-2 (CXCL6) level was below the detection limit (<12.0 pg/mL) in all studied groups. However, the level of IL-8, one of the most potent neutrophil chemotaxis factors was increased both in the active and remission NMOSD CSF compared with the control groups. Moreover, chemokines associated with recruitment of lymphocytes or monocytes/macrophages BCA-1, MIG, MIP-1α, and MIP-1δ were increased in the active and remission NMOSD CSF compared with RRMS CSF during relapse or remission. These data suggest that IL-8 might be responsible for neutrophil recruitment to CSF in NMOSD. C5a, which is released during activation of complement classic pathway, is recognized as a mediator of inflammation and another potent attractant and neutrophils activator (24). Consequently, we analyzed C5a level in CSF and serum and found that it was significantly increased in NMOSD (both in remission and active stage), contrary to RRMS or OND (Figure 1A).
Table 1.
pg/mL | NMOSD active (n = 4) | NMOSD remission (n = 3) | OND (n = 8) | RRMS relapse (n = 4) | RRMS remission (n = 4) | p < 0.05 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
†6Ckine (CCL21) | 175.7 ± 28.12 | 154.5 ± 31.77 | 185.3 ± 84.47 | 96.8 ± 67.36 | 167.5 ± 44.87 | |
†BCA-1 (CXCL13) | 34.8 ± 33.39 | 23.0 ± 23.03 | 0.6 ± 0.27 | 4.2 ± 6.57 | 6.6 ± 6.67 | a, d |
†CTACK (CCL27) | 3.9 ± 1.55 | 2.9 ± 1.06 | 2.9 ± 1.07 | 2.0 ± 0.73 | 4.5 ± 3.36 | |
#,‡ENA-78 (CXCL5) | 59.3 ± 39.88 | 49.0 ± 38.90 | 68.0 ± 57.33 | 167.8 ± 78.51 | 98.1 ± 31.93 | b, c |
#,†Eotaxin-1 (CCL11) | 11.8 ± 7.87 | 8.0 ± 6.29 | 4.6 ± 3.51 | 9.9 ± 6.01 | 6.9 ± 2.46 | |
#,†Eotaxin-2 (CCL24) | 8.7 ± 7.66 | 1.3 ± 2.92 | 0.26 ± 0.000 | 0.3 ± 0.21 | 0.3 ± 0.02 | |
#,†Eotaxin -3 (CCL26) | 5.1 ± 3.11 | 3.0 ± 0.99 | 2.0 ± 1.23 | 1.8 ± 0.53 | 2.0 ± 0.63 | |
†,‡Factalkine (CX3CL1) | 80.9 ± 44.85 | 90.9 ± 41.09 | 71.2 ± 23.58 | 69.6 ± 33.82 | 81.6 ± 8.68 | |
#,‡GCP-2 (CXCL6) | <12.0 | <12.0 | <12.0 | <12.0 | <12.0 | |
#,‡GM-CSF | 2.2 ± 2.08 | 1.0 ± 1.33 | 1.0 ± 1.15 | 1.1 ± 0.74 | 0.9 ± 0.65 | |
#,‡GRO-α (NAP-3 CXCL1) | 28.3 ± 7.55 | 25.9 ± 7.90 | 19.8 ± 2.39 | 21.6 ± 1.61 | 28.7 ± 16.97 | a, d |
#,‡GRO -β (CXCL2) | 2.7 ± 0.90 | 1.9 ± 0.42 | 1.3 ± 0.77 | 1.7 ± 0.52 | 1.9 ± 0.76 | |
†,‡I-309 (CCL1) | 20.0 ± 7.39 | 17.7 ± 7.13 | 5.4 ± 2.46 | 9.5 ± 7.32 | 10.7 ± 4.16 | a, b, d |
IFN-γ | 0.91 ± 0.410 | 0.27 ± 0.34 | 0.13 ± 0.035 | 0.14 ± 0.029 | 0.15 ± 0.034 | a |
IL-1β | 7.6 ± 0.98 | 6.0 ± 0.88 | 0.50 ± 0.146 | 0.76 ± 0.235 | 1.20 ± 8.556 | a, b, d |
IL-2 | 0.83 ± 0.661 | 0.49 ± 0.456 | 0.41 ± 0.100 | 0.45 ± 0.070 | 0.49 ± 0.097 | |
IL-4 | 3.09 ± 1.777 | 2.65 ± 0.909 | 3.39 ± 2.296 | 6.88 ± 3.265 | 3.96 ± 1.850 | |
IL-6 | 7.0 ± 4.33 | 7.6 ± 2.69 | 8.9 ± 9.95 | 8.0 ± 10.11 | 11.3 ± 18.96 | |
#,‡IL-8 (CXCL8) | 44.9 ± 23.99 | 36.8 ± 25.33 | 20.8 ± 7.27 | 14.5 ± 9.29 | 15.8 ± 20.67 | b, c |
IL-10 | 1.9 ± 1.03 | 18.6 ± 8.28 | 1.96 ± 0.679 | 3.02 ± 0.950 | 3.03 ± 1.674 | b, c, d, e |
IL-16 | 155.5 ± 108.77 | 97.0 ± 69.09 | 35.7 ± 19.56 | 45.4 ± 23.72 | 65.1 ± 33.69 | |
†IP-10 (CXCL10) | 220.1 ± 205.44 | 146.7 ± 199.87 | 24.1 ± 12.29 | 29.9 ± 27.63 | 42.4 ± 21.40 | |
†I-TAC (CXCL11) | 26.9 ± 25.80 | 28.3 ± 24.95 | 7.9 ± 3.18 | 12.9 ± 9.12 | 15.6 ± 7.35 | |
†,‡MCP-1 (CCL2) | 169.3 ± 126.49 | 132.5 ± 112.59 | 111.1 ± 21.74 | 101.7 ± 55.76 | 125.7 ± 120.66 | |
†,‡MCP-2 (CCL8) | 12.9 ± 13.90 | 8.0 ± 9.29 | 2.3 ± 1.65 | 2.1 ± 1.90 | 3.7 ± 0.95 | |
†,‡MCP-3 (CCL7) | 8.7 ± 8.89 | 5.2 ± 4.02 | 1.7 ± 0.59 | 1.7 ± 0.63 | 1.9 ± 0.76 | |
†,‡MCP-4 (CCL13) | 39.4 ± 41.54 | 31.9 ± 52.05 | 100.14 ± 10.37 | 50.1 ± 54.59 | 57.9 ± 52.48 | a, d |
†MDC (CCL22) | 23.9 ± 30.03 | 13.9 ± 25.12 | 2.5 ± 1.02 | 7.5 ± 9.64 | 6.8 ± 5.81 | |
MIF | 997.2 ± 979.97 | 699.9 ± 893.42 | 801.1 ± 501.02 | 223.7 ± 80.45 | 1,454.0 ± 2,957.27 | |
†MIG (CXCL9) | 238.9 ± 209.54 | 169.9 ± 195.94 | 10.6 ± 3.78 | 17.7 ± 19.39 | 16.1 ± 4.71 | a, b, c, d |
†,‡MIP-1α (CCL3) | 4.9 ± 3.90 | 3.0 ± 2.99 | 0.7 ± 0.24 | 1.9 ± 1.71 | 2.4 ± 0.83 | a, d |
‡MIP-1δ (CCL15) | 207.1 ± 98.46 | 139.2 ± 93.29 | 85.9 ± 28.49 | 75.1 ± 26.93 | 119.5 ± 45.59 | a, b |
†MIP-3α (CCL20) | 0.65 ± 0.497 | 0.38 ± 0.383 | 0.38 ± 0.076 | 0.46 ± 0.088 | 0.64 ± 0.557 | |
†MIP-3β (CCL19) | 90.6 ± 59.98 | 65.2 ± 67.92 | 33.1 ± 13.07 | 34.2 ± 31.94 | 47.5 ± 27.61 | a |
†,‡MPIF-1 (CCL23) | 55.1 ± 59.90 | 27.8 ± 21.88 | 86.0 ± 37.02 | 100.0 ± 80.00 | 58.9 ± 51.31 | |
†SCYB16 (CXCL16) | 469.1 ± 43.19 | 449.1 ± 43.18 | 420.7 ± 35.64 | 404.6 ± 62.92 | 449.2 ± 29.52 | |
†,‡SDF-1α + β (CXCL12) | 434.4 ± 243.71 | 399.8 ± 245.79 | 394.4 ± 193.50 | 212.0 ± 161.03 | 381.9 ± 155.81 | b |
†TARC (CCL17) | 95.9 ± 67.98 | 53.9 ± 55.92 | 100.0 ± 0.00 | 100.00 ± 0.000 | 85.9 ± 37.23 | |
†TECK (CCL25) | 77.8 ± 32.51 | 52.5 ± 29.55 | 45.3 ± 8.11 | 53.6 ± 11.93 | 61.1 ± 38.13 | a, d |
TNFα | 12.6 ± 7.18 | 7.9 ± 4.54 | 4.2 ± 2.93 | 6.9 ± 3.89 | 6.3 ± 2.17 | a, b, e |
Statistically significant differences between (a) NMOSD active and OND; (b) NMOSD active and relapse RRMS (c); NMOSD remission and remission RRMS; (d) NMOSD remission and OND; and (e) NMOSD active and NMOSD remission.
#Chemokine associated with neutrophil recruitment/activation.
†Chemokine associated with lymphocyte recruitment/activation.
‡Chemokine associated with monocyte/macrophage recruitment/activation.
C5a in NMOSD CSF Is Responsible for Neutrophil Chemotaxis, Diapedesis, and Preactivation to More Intensive Phagocytosis and ROI Production
We verified whether C5a present in CSF of NMOSD patients had an ability to induce chemotaxis of neutrophils. In this set of experiments, we used HC neutrophils to mimic all the pathophysiological mechanisms responsible for transition from health to pathology. We found that NMOSD CSF in the active and remission phase, as well as CSF from relapse MS, contrary to remission MS and OND, possessed chemotaxis properties toward non-stimulated HC neutrophils (Figure 1B). Deactivating C5a abrogated chemotaxis in the presence of NMOSD CSF by nearly 40%, compared with isotype control, but not in relapse MS CSF (Figure 1C). Analysis of the effect of NMOSD CSF on the surface adhesion molecules of HC neutrophils showed increased CD11b, CD18, and CD62L expression, contrary to MS or OND CSF. Experiments with neutralizing mAbs showed that this effect was dependent on the C5a, confirming its crucial role in preactivation of non-stimulated HC neutrophils (Figure S2A in Supplementary Material). In addition, this finding was confirmed by ex vivo analysis of circulating neutrophils from active NMOSD patients which were characterized by high expression of CD11b, CD18, and CD62L, opposite to RRMS, OND, or HC (Figure S2B in Supplementary Material).
Preactivated neutrophils are characterized by more intensive phagocytosis and ROI production. It is dependent on endo- and exogenous signals from the site of inflammation. We noted increased phagocytosis and ROI production in HC neutrophils preincubated with active NMOSD CSF and subsequently stimulated with E. coli (phagocytosis) or PMA (ROI production), contrary to RRMS or OND CSF (Figures S3A and S4A in Supplementary Material). This effect was reversed by C5a-neutralizing mAbs (Figures S3B and S4B in Supplementary Material). Ex vivo analysis of circulating neutrophils from active NMOSD patients showed more intensive phagocytosis and ROI production, compared with neutrophils from RRMS, OND, or HC (Figures S3C and S4C in Supplementary Material). This set of experiments revealed that NMOSD CSF preactivates HC neutrophils predominantly with C5a and this process is a reflection of neutrophil preactivation observed in NMOSD patients in vivo during the active phase of the disease.
Anti-AQP4 Ab-Positive Serum Activates Membrane Attack Complex on the Surface of Astrocytes
In the next set of experiments, we verified the pathogenic character of anti-AQP-4 Abs present in NMOSD serum toward astrocytes. As human astrocytes present in BBB acquire membrane proteins CD46 and CD55 that inhibit activation of the complement cascade (Chu) in contact with endothelial cells (ECs), we used astrocytes derived from human induced neural stem cells which had no contact with ECs, therefore did not express membrane complement inhibitory proteins (8). As IgG1 class immunoglobulins possess the strongest properties to trigger Chu after binding the antigen, we used anti-IgG1 and anti-AQP4 serotype of IgG2, which does not cross-react with IgG1 mAbs, to detect the reactivity of anti-AQP4 Ab-positive serum against astrocytes. First, we demonstrated the formation of immunological complexes on the surface of astrocytes in a double-staining immunocytochemical analysis after 1-h incubation with NMOSD serum (10% v/v), contrary to RRMS or HC serum (Figure 2A). Confocal z-stack microscopy analysis confirmed the formation of IgG1–AQP4 complexes on the astrocyte surface in the presence of NMOSD serum (Figure 2A). Next, using the same incubation conditions, we detected C5b-9 formation (Figure 2B, lower panel). Negative signal obtained with heat-inactivated serum (56°C, 30 min), contrary to positive signal in non-heated serum confirmed that C5b-9 formation was an effect of NMOSD serum (Figure 2B).
Formation of C5b-9 Complex Is Associated With Astrocyte Lysis and Decreased GFAP Expression Only in a Small Number of Cells
In response to Ab-complement-mediated attack, cells can undergo lysis (>5% of lysed cells) or, when exposed to sublytic (<5% of lysed cells) amounts of C5b-9, become activated (25). To ensure how anti-AQP4 Ab-positive serum affects astrocytes, LDH was measured in the supernatants. We found that astrocytes exposed to anti-AQP4 Ab-positive serum, contrary to RRMS or HC serum, released increased amounts of LDH. Normalization of sample concentration to LDH levels present in positive and negative controls revealed that approximately 11% of astrocytes exposed anti-AQP4 Ab-positive serum underwent lysis (Figure 3A). This effect was dependent on the complement system as serum heating caused complement inactivation and reduction of LDH release.
Glial fibrillary acidic protein plays a central role in astrocyte–neuron interactions, responsible for the cytoskeleton structure of glia cells and for maintaining their mechanical strength, as well as supporting neighboring neurons and the BBB (26). Therefore, we investigated whether anti-AQP4 Ab-complement-induced attack can interfere with astrocyte GFAP expression. Double staining of astrocytes with C5b-9 and GFAP revealed that NMOSD serum, contrary to RRMS or HC serum, activated C5b-9 complex formation and reduced GFAP expression (Figure 3B). The z-stack confocal analysis confirmed C5b-9 complex formation on astrocyte cell surface in the presence of anti-AQP4 Ab-positive serum (Figure 3C). The fluorescence intensity analysis showed that only cells with high deposition of C5b-9 (high signal in ICC analysis) had decreased expression of GFAP (10% of all astrocytes), whereas the rest of astrocytes were characterized by low C5b-9 deposition and normal GFAP expression, comparable to astrocytes incubated with HC or RRMS serum (Figure 3C, green/red arrows). These findings showed that the majority astrocytes are resistant to AQP4-Chu-induced destruction, probably due to their membrane expression of complement inhibitory protein CD59 (8, 27), or sublytic C5b-9 concentration (28), suggesting that another parallel mechanism of astrocyte destruction in NMOSD inflammation should exist.
Astrocytes Recruit Neutrophils in the Presence of Anti-AQP-4 Ab NMOSD Serum as a Result of C5a Release
To confirm that anti-AQP-4 Ab binding astrocytes induce inflammation via recruitment of neutrophils, we examined chemotaxis capacity of HC neutrophils in the presence of astrocytes preincubated with 10% NMOSD serum. Serum without astrocytes and astrocytes stimulated by PMA in the absence of serum were used as the controls. We found that NMOSD and RRMS sera alone possessed weak chemotaxis properties toward neutrophils (9% of beads). Moreover, PMA-stimulated astrocytes in the absence of serum possessed chemotaxis property (16% of beads), probably as the result of the release of CXCL1 (29, 30) (Figure 4A). HC neutrophil chemotaxis was potently increased in the presence of astrocytes preincubated with NMOSD serum, compared with RRMS or HC serum (205% of beads in NMOSD, 97% in RRMS, and 30% in HC). When neutralizing anti-C5a mAbs were used, inhibition of HC neutrophil chemotaxis about 57% was detected only in NMOSD serum incubations, in oppose to RRMS serum (Figure 4A, right panel). This was accompanied by the high concentration of C5a detected in supernatants during incubation of astrocytes with NMOSD serum, unlike RRMS or HC serum (Figures 4B,C).
Preactivated HC Neutrophils Polarize Astrocytes to Proinflammatory Cells and Enhance Glutamate Pump Dysregulation
The last question we addressed was how antibody-complement–neutrophil axis affects function of astrocytes and what is the role of neutrophils in this process? We assumed that in NMOSD, astrocytes bind anti-AQP4 Abs which activate complement cascade which in turn induces neutrophil recruitment and preactivation via C5a. As only a subset of astrocytes was destructed as a consequence of C5b-9 formation, we hypothesized that preactivated neutrophils might deregulate the remaining astrocytes. Therefore, we created an in vitro model of NMOSD inflammation, in which human astrocytes were first exposed to anti-AQP4 Ab-positive NMOSD serum and subsequently incubated with HC neutrophils (Figure 5A). In this set of experiments, we used NMOSD serum collected during active phase of the disease, not only as anti-AQP4 Abs are typically not produced intrathecally resulting in their low concentration in CSF (31) but also because serum contains all complement components needed for the reaction. Supernatants collected at three time points were analyzed for 27 pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines by multi ELISA, as well as for glutamate and C5a concentrations. In addition, the morphology of astrocytes was analyzed using differential interference contrast microscopy.
We found that astrocytes exposed to anti-AQP4 Ab-positive NMOSD serum produced increased amounts of proinflammatory cytokines TNF, GM-CSF, IL-17, and IL-1β and chemokines CXCL1, IL-8, and RANTES in opposition to incubations with HC serum (Figure 5B; Table S1 in Supplementary Material) or RRMS serum (data not shown). Subsequent incubation of astrocytes with HC neutrophils further enhanced proinflammatory cytokine and chemokine production, making the differences between astrocytes exposed to NMOSD serum and control groups more clearly visible (Figure 5B; Table S1 in Supplementary Material). High levels of INF-γ, IL-8, MIP-1β, IL1b, and MIP-1α production by astrocytes exposed to NMOSD serum and HC neutrophils corresponded with their high concentrations in NMOSD CSF in the active stage of disease. In the same way, low IL-10 production corresponded with low concentration in the active NMOSD CSF.
Dysregulation of extracellular glutamate is another possible mechanism of NMOSD pathogenesis. Astrocytes are the major cell types that regulate extracellular glutamate concentration in brain, by downregulating it when it is briefly increased at glutamatergic synapse and maintaining low extracellular levels at rest (4). The analysis of glutamate concentration in supernatants revealed its increased level only in the incubation in which astrocytes were first exposed to NMOSD serum (Figure 5C). In the presence of HC neutrophils, glutamate concentration was further increased, while neutralizing anti-C5a mAbs reversed this effect. Glutamate level was not affected in other experimental settings, for example, astrocytes exposed to HC or RRMS serum, astrocytes exposed to HC or RRMS serum and subsequently to HC neutrophils. In vivo analysis of glutamate in CSF confirmed its high concentration in NMOSD patients in comparison to other studied groups (Figure 5D). The reverse of glutamate pump out into extracellular space might be a result of disruption of AQP4 receptors and, as a consequence, active transport of H2O to extracellular space. Low levels of H2O in cells result in decreasing cell volume. The living cell analysis by DIC microscopy revealed the reduction of cell volume and disruption of astrocyte shape only in the incubations in which astrocytes first were exposed to NMOSD serum and subsequently to HC neutrophils (Figure 5E, low-right panel). Neutralizing anti-C5a mAbs reversed this effect. In other studied incubations, no changes in astrocyte morphology were observed (Figure 5E).
Discussion
Although many questions were raised about the autoimmune pathogenesis of NMOSD, the role of neutrophils remains unsolved. As histological findings demonstrated complement deposits associated with granulocyte infiltration in postmortem NMOSD brains (5, 7, 19), it has been suggested that pathological engagement of neutrophils in NMOSD might be an effect of complement system activation (6). Here, we demonstrated the key role of complement activation triggered by AQP4–IgG binding AQP4 on astrocytes in exclusive recruitment and activation of neutrophils in NMOSD. This reaction determines the release of the anaphylatoxin C5a which is a specific chemoattractant for neutrophils that contrary to T, B, or NK cells, possess high expression of C5a receptors (CD88) (32, 33). Previous studies assessing chemokines and cytokines related to neutrophil recruitment in NMOSD demonstrated increased levels of IL-8 and IL-17 in CSF (34) as well as ENA-78, CCL4, or G-CSF in serum (17, 35). We found that among chemotaxis factors responsible for neutrophil or eosinophil recruitment, only IL-8 level was elevated in NMOSD CSF. Conversely, we demonstrated significantly higher concentration of C5a in NMOSD CSF in comparison to RRMS or OND CSF which was reflected by increased C5a concentration in NMOSD serum. Increased concentrations of ENA-78, CCL4, and G-CSF found in the serum of NMOSD patients may be a result of their release by preactivated circulating neutrophils (36). The differences between the studies may be due to the variations in time of sample collection and inclusion of NMOSD patients undergoing immunosuppressive/immunomodulatory therapies. In this study, samples collected in acute phase of the disease were obtained from treatment-naïve patients.
Next, we demonstrated the vital role of C5a for preactivation of HC neutrophils in vitro and ex vivo in NMOSD patients. Experiments, in which HC neutrophils were preincubated with NMOSD CSF in the presence of neutralizing anti-C5a mAbs, revealed that C5a was responsible for increased neutrophil chemotaxis, diapedesis, adhesion molecule expression, phagocytosis, and ROI production. These in vitro experiments correlated with ex vivo findings demonstrating preactivation of peripheral blood neutrophils in NMOSD patients. Neutrophils in NMOSD were not fully activated, as neutrophils should receive two stimulating signals, or directly recognize a pathogen via toll-like receptors. In NMOSD, inflammation is aseptic; therefore, neutrophils received only one signal from the site of inflammation. Preactivation is a sensitive process which is mediated when neutrophils receive and recognize stimulus present at a very low concentration, which is dependent on the intensity of immunological reaction and distance of circulating neutrophils from the site of inflammation. In fact, C5a is able to preactivate neutrophils at a concentration of 1 pg/mL which results in intracellular calcium mobilization, stimulation of chemotaxis, aggregation, but not activation (37). We found very high concentration of C5a in NMOSD CSF (>4,000 pg/mL) and low concentration in NMOSD serum (43.5 ± 13.98 pg/mL). This explains why peripheral blood neutrophils are pre-activated but not fully activated and why they migrate to CNS. The key role of complement activation was also supported by a recent pilot study showing a beneficial effect of eculizumab, a humanized monoclonal IgG that neutralizes C5 and its cleavage to C5a, in the treatment of active NMOSD (38).
Physiological regulation of complement activation is dependent on the concentration of autoantibody, class of immunoglobulin, and presence of complement protection proteins on the cell surface (39). Therefore, for subsequent experiments patients’ sera collected during the active phase of the disease, which contained all complement components and autoantibodies at concentrations adequate to clinical symptoms, were used. We have demonstrated that anti-AQP4 Ab-positive NMOSD serum activated complement cascade which resulted in C5a release and C5b-9 complexes formation, astrocyte lysis, and loss of GFAP expression. In addition, we provided evidence that C5a released during this reaction was functionally active, as supernatant collected after incubation of astrocytes with NMOSD serum was able to preactivate and recruit HC neutrophils. ICC analysis showed colocalization of IgG1 with AQP4 protein, as well as GFAP downregulation associated with C5b-9 formation, confirming the crucial role of anti-AQP4 Ab binding triggering complement cascade. However, only a small subset (~10–11%) of cultured astrocytes was lysed and demonstrated GFAP loss as a result of C5b-9 formation, even though all astrocytes were opsonized by IgG1. This might be a result of membrane expression of complement regulatory proteins on astrocyte surface (27, 28) or sublytic concentration of C5b-9 (28). Postmortem histological analysis revealed that in normal human brain, opposite to other organs, astrocytes are devoid of CD46 (membrane cofactor protein), CD55 (decay accelerating factor), or CD59 (protectin) that inhibit activation of the Chu cascade (8). However, some of in vitro studies demonstrated these proteins in cultured human astrocytes (28, 39–41). One of the recent studies showed that human brain cortical astrocytes are negative for membrane CD46 and CD55, but positive for membrane CD59 (8). Based on the results of our study, it is highly probable that astrocytes used in our experiments possessed membrane complement inhibitory proteins, as the majority of astrocytes retained adherence and produced increased amounts of chemokines/cytokines. Consequently, we concluded that there should be another mechanism by which astrocytes are pathologically affected. Therefore, we examined the role of preactivated neutrophils in astrocyte damage. Previous studies have highlighted the role of glutamate, which high concentration, as the result of disruption of AQP4 channel, is cytopathic for neurons (42). To address this issue, we constructed an in vitro model of NMOSD inflammation, in attempt to visualize how anti-AQP4 Abs, complement system and neutrophils affect together astrocyte status. Primary cultured human astrocytes were first exposed to NMOSD anti-AQP4 Ab-positive serum and subsequently to freshly isolated neutrophils from HCs. By using HC instead of NMOSD neutrophils, we tried to mimic all the pathophysiological mechanisms responsible for transition from health to pathology. This was not possible with peripheral blood neutrophils from NMOSD as they were already preactivated during the course of the disease (16). Glutamate concentration in supernatants was the highest in the experiments in which astrocytes were first exposed to anti-AQP4 Ab-positive serum, and subsequently to HC neutrophils, suggesting that neutrophils are the essential element to complete pathological reaction. Two mechanisms could be responsible for pathological glutamate transport following anti-AQP4 Ab binding. First one might be dependent on excitatory aminoacid transporter 2 (EAAT2) downregulation which affects glutamate uptake (43). Another possibility is that glutamate transport by the plasma membrane transporters is reversible and depends on [Na+]/[K+] extra/intracellular concentration. Therefore, anti-AQP4 Abs interfere with Na+–K+ ATPase and K+ channels affecting [Na+]/[K+] extra and intracellular levels. As a consequence, when intracellular [Na+]/extracellular [K+] increases or extracellular [Na+]/intracellular [K+] decreases, glutamate can be transported in the outward direction (44). This relationship is a result of clustering AQP4 water channel with other proteins, Na+, K+-ATPaze, K+ channels, EAAT2, and mGluR5 present in astrocyte membrane (45). We also demonstrated that astrocytes reduced their cell volume and changed their shape. The disruption of AQP4 receptors resulted in inhibition of active transport of H2O to intracellular space and decrease in cell volume, which was additionally facilitated by proinflammatory environment mediated by preactivated neutrophils. This set of experiments revealed that astrocyte destabilization and dysregulation of glutamate pump require cooperation of anti-AQP4 Abs and neutrophils.
We also showed an unexpected role of C5a-preactivated neutrophils in induction of reactive astrocytes producing TNF, GM-CSF, IL-1, and IL-17 and chemokines CXCL1, IL-8, and RANTES. Interestingly, this effect was not observed when astrocytes were exposed to freshly isolated HC neutrophils, or HC neutrophils incubated with HC serum. The increased cytokine production by astrocytes corresponded with high cytokine concentrations in CSF, providing a link between in vitro findings and pathophysiology of NMOSD in vivo. In BBB model, astrocytes cocultured with epithelial cells and exposed to NMO–IgG produced increased amounts of IL-6, which induced CCL2 and IL-8 chemokine production by adjacent microvascular ECs (46). These data partially corresponded with our findings showing increased IL-8 levels both in NMOSD CSF and in supernatants after incubation of astrocytes with NMOSD serum and HC neutrophils, while IL-6 level was not significantly increased in NMOSD CSF, however, was elevated in astrocyte culture supernatants. Reactive astrocytes together with preactivated neutrophils create proinflammatory environment which might influence the status of other cells in the CNS: neurons, oligodendrocytes, and brain-infiltrating T lymphocytes (46, 47).
A limitation of our study is a small number of participants in each group, and nearly equal gender distribution in NMOSD group, which is not a representative epidemiological distribution for MNOSD, where male to female ratio is about 1:3.6 to 1:10.4 (1). However, no data are available on the major differences in neutrophil function, complement component concentration and astrocyte morphology depending on the patient gender. Therefore, the results presented in this study seem to be relevant to both genders.
To summarize, our study demonstrated that NMOSD pathogenesis is based on the two parallel processes triggered by binding anti-AQP4 Abs to AQP4 on the surface of astrocytes. First phase is dependent on complement system activation and neutrophil recruitment and preactivation via C5a. This phase is accompanied by physical destruction of a small rate of astrocytes (10%) by C5b-9 complex. Second phase is dependent on the C5a-preactivated neutrophils which, by providing proinflammatory environment, mediate reactive astrocyte formation and facilitate impairment of astrocyte function via toxic effect of glutamate (Figure 6).
Ethics Statement
The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Medical University of Lodz (RNN/44/14/KE), and informed consent was obtained from each participant of the study.
Author Contributions
PPiatek, MD, and PL designed research; PPiatek, MD, PPrzygodzka, KD, MM, and PL performed research; PL contributed new reagents/analytic tools; NL and PL analyzed data and wrote the paper.
Conflict of Interest Statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Acknowledgments
We thank Prof. K. Selmaj and M. Namiecinska PhD for their critical comments during preparation of the manuscript.
Footnotes
Funding. This work was supported by the grant from the National Science Centre 2015/17/B/NZ6/04251.
Supplementary Material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2018.01694/full#supplementary-material.
References
- 1.Zekeridou A, Lennon VA. Aquaporin-4 autoimmunity. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm (2015) 2:e110. 10.1212/NXI.0000000000000110 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Lennon VA, Wingerchuk DM, Kryzer TJ, Pittock SJ, Lucchinetti CF, Fujihara K, et al. A serum autoantibody marker of neuromyelitis optica: distinction from multiple sclerosis. Lancet (2004) 364:2106–12. 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17551-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Metz I, Beißbarth T, Ellenberger D, Pache F, Stork L, Ringelstein M, et al. Serum peptide reactivities may distinguish neuromyelitis optica subgroups and multiple sclerosis. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm (2016) 3:e204. 10.1212/NXI.0000000000000204 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Yang X, Ransom BR, Ma JF. The role of AQP4 in neuromyelitis optica: more answers, more questions. J Neuroimmunol (2016) 298:63–70. 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2016.06.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Lucchinetti CF, Mandler RN, McGavern D, Bruck W, Gleich G, Ransohoff RM, et al. A role for humoral mechanisms in the pathogenesis of Devic’s neuromyelitis optica. Brain (2002) 125:1450–61. 10.1093/brain/awf151 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Vincent T, Saikali P, Cayrol R, Roth AD, Bar-Or A, Prat A, et al. Functional consequences of neuromyelitis optica-IgG astrocyte interactions on blood-brain barrier permeability and granulocyte recruitment. J Immunol (2008) 181:5730–7. 10.4049/jimmunol.181.8.5730 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Saadoun S, Waters P, Bell BA, Vincent A, Verkman AS, Papadopoulos MC. Intra-cerebral injection of neuromyelitis optica immunoglobulin G and human complement produces neuromyelitis optica lesions in mice. Brain (2010) 133:349–61. 10.1093/brain/awp309 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Saadoun S, Papadopoulos MC. Role of membrane complement regulators in neuromyelitis optica. Mult Scler (2015) 21:1644–54. 10.1177/1352458515571446 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Takeshita Y, Obermeier B, Cotleur AC, Spampinato SF, Shimizu F, Yamamoto E, et al. Effects of neuromyelitis optica-IgG at the blood-brain barrier in vitro. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm (2016) 4(1):e311. 10.1212/NXI.0000000000000311 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Tekkök SB, Ye Z, Ransom BR. Excitotoxic mechanisms of ischemic injury in myelinated white matter. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab (2007) 27:1540–52. 10.1038/sj.jcbfm.9600455 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Chever O, Djukic B, McCarthy KD, Amzica F. Implication of Kir4.1 channel in excess potassium clearance: an in vivo study on anesthetized glial-conditional Kir4.1 knock-out mice. J Neurosci (2010) 30:15769–77. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2078-10.2010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Burda JE, Sofroniew MV. Reactive gliosis and the multicellular response to CNS damage and disease. Neuron (2014) 81:229–48. 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.12.034 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Rossi D. Astrocyte physiopathology: at the crossroads of intercellular networking, inflammation and cell death. Prog Neurobiol (2015) 130:86–120. 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2015.04.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Babcock AA, Kuziel WA, Rivest S, Owens T. Chemokine expression by glial cells directs leukocytes to sites of axonal injury in the CNS. J Neurosci (2003) 23:7922–30. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-21-07922.2003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Lewkowicz N, Mycko MP, Przygodzka P, Ćwiklińska H, Cichalewska M, Matysiak M, et al. Induction of human IL-10-producing neutrophils by LPS-stimulated Treg cells and IL-10. Mucosal Immunol (2016) 9:364–78. 10.1038/mi.2015.66 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Hertwig L, Pache F, Romero-Suarez S, Stürner KH, Borisow N, Behrens J, et al. Distinct functionality of neutrophils in multiple sclerosis and neuromyelitis optica. Mult Scler (2016) 22:160–73. 10.1177/1352458515586084 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Yang T, Wang S, Zheng Q, Wang L, Li Q, Wei M, et al. Increased plasma levels of epithelial neutrophil-activating peptide 78/CXCL5 during the remission of neuromyelitis optica. BMC Neurol (2016) 16:96. 10.1186/s12883-016-0622-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Zhang H, Bennett JL, Verkman AS. Ex vivo spinal cord slice model of neuromyelitis optica reveals novel immunopathogenic mechanisms. Ann Neurol (2011) 70:943–54. 10.1002/ana.22551 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Saadoun S, Waters P, MacDonald C, Bell BA, Vincent A, Verkman AS, et al. Neutrophil protease inhibition reduces neuromyelitis optica-immunoglobulin G-induced damage in mouse brain. Ann Neurol (2012) 71:323–33. 10.1002/ana.22686 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Wingerchuk DM, Hogancamp WF, O’Brien PC, Weinshenker BG. The clinical course of neuromyelitis optica (Devic’s syndrome). Neurology (1999) 53:1107–14. 10.1212/WNL.53.5.1107 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Barkhof F, Filippi M, Miller DH, Scheltens P, Campi A, Polman CH, et al. Comparison of MRI criteria at first presentation to predict conversion to clinically definite multiple sclerosis. Brain (1997) 120:2059–69. 10.1093/brain/120.11.2059 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Polman CH, Reingold SC, Banwell B, Clanet M, Cohen JA, Filippi M, et al. Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: revisions to the McDonald criteria. Ann Neurol (2011) 69:292–302. 10.1002/ana.22366 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Drozd AM, Walczak MP, Piaskowski S, Stoczynska-Fidelus E, Rieske P, Grzela DP. Generation of human iPSCs from cells of fibroblastic and epithelial origin by means of the oriP/EBNA-1 episomal eprogramming system. Stem Cell Res Ther (2015) 6:122. 10.1186/s13287-015-0112-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Ehrengruber MU, Geiser T, Deranleau DA. Activation of human neutrophils by C3a and C5a. Comparison of the effects on shape changes, chemotaxis, secretion, and respiratory burst. FEBS Lett (1994) 346:181–4. 10.1016/0014-5793(94)00463-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Pippin JW, Durvasula R, Petermann A, Hiromura K, Couser WG, Shankland SJ. DNA damage is a novel response to sublytic complement C5b-9-induced injury in podocytes. J Clin Invest (2003) 111:877–85. 10.1172/JCI200315645 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Hol EM, Pekny M. Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and the astrocyte intermediate filament system in diseases of the central nervous system. Curr Opin Cell Biol (2015) 32:121–30. 10.1016/j.ceb.2015.02.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Spiller OB, Moretto G, Kim SU, Morgan BP, Devine DV. Complement expression on astrocytes and astrocytoma cell lines: failure of complement regulation at the C3 level correlates with very low CD55 expression. J Neuroimmunol (1996) 71:97–106. 10.1016/S0165-5728(96)00136-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Nishiyama S, Misu T, Nuriya M, Takano R, Takahashi T, Nakashima I, et al. Complement-dependent and -independent aquaporin 4-antibody-mediated cytotoxicity in human astrocytes: pathogenetic implications in neuromyelitis optica. Biochem Biophys Rep (2016) 7:45–51. 10.1016/j.bbrep.2016.05.012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Cekanaviciute E, Buckwalter MS. Astrocytes: integrative regulators of neuroinflammation in stroke and other neurological diseases. Neurotherapeutics (2016) 13:685–701. 10.1007/s13311-016-0477-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Pineau I, Sun L, Bastien D, Lacroix S. Astrocytes initiate inflammation in the injured mouse spinal cord by promoting the entry of neutrophils and inflammatory monocytes in an IL-1 receptor/MyD88-dependent fashion. Brain Behav Immun (2010) 24:540–53. 10.1016/j.bbi.2009.11.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Jarius S, Franciotta D, Paul F, Ruprecht K, Bergamaschi R, Rommer PS, et al. Cerebrospinal fluid antibodies to aquaporin-4 in neuromyelitis optica and related disorders: frequency, origin, and diagnostic relevance. J Neuroinflammation (2010) 7:52. 10.1186/1742-2094-7-52 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Yan C, Gao H. New insights for C5a and C5a receptors in sepsis. Front Immunol (2012) 3:368. 10.3389/fimmu.2012.00368 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Carrigan SO, Pink SB, Stadnyk AW. Neutrophil transepithelial migration in response to the chemoattractant fMLP but not C5a is phospholipase D-dependent and related to the use of CD11b/CD18. J Leukoc Biol (2007) 82:1575–84. 10.1189/jlb.0806528 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Ishizu T, Osoegawa M, Mei FJ, Kikuchi H, Tanaka M, Takakura Y, et al. Intrathecal activation of the IL-17/IL-8 axis in opticospinal multiple sclerosis. Brain (2005) 128:988–1002. 10.1093/brain/awh453 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Michael BD, Elsone L, Griffiths MJ, Faragher B, Borrow R, Solomon T, et al. Post-acute serum eosinophil and neutrophil-associated cytokine/chemokine profile can distinguish between patients with neuromyelitis optica and multiple sclerosis; and identifies potential pathophysiological mechanisms – a pilot study. Cytokine (2013) 64:90–6. 10.1016/j.cyto.2013.07.019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Tecchio C, Cassatella MA. Neutrophil-derived chemokines on the road to immunity. Semin Immunol (2016) 28:119–28. 10.1016/j.smim.2016.04.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Fujita E, Farkas I, Campbell W, Baranyi L, Okada H, Okada N. Inactivation of C5a anaphylatoxin by a peptide that is complementary to a region of C5a. J Immunol (2004) 172:6382–7. 10.4049/jimmunol.172.10.6382 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Pittock SJ, Lennon VA, McKeon A, Mandrekar J, Weinshenker BG, Lucchinetti CF, et al. Eculizumab in AQP4-IgG-positive relapsing neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders: an open-label pilot study. Lancet Neurol (2013) 12:554–62. 10.1016/S1474-4422(13)70076-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Morgan BP. The membrane attack complex as an inflammatory trigger. Immunobiology (2016) 221:747–51. 10.1016/j.imbio.2015.04.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Gordon DL, Sadlon TA, Wesselingh SL, Russell SM, Johnstone RW, Purcell DF. Human astrocytes express membrane cofactor protein (CD46), a regulator of complement activation. J Neuroimmunol (1992) 36:199–208. 10.1016/0165-5728(92)90051-L [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Gordon DL, Sadlon T, Hefford C, Adrian D. Expression of CD59, a regulator of the membrane attack complex of complement, on human astrocytes. Brain Res Mol Brain Res (1993) 18:335–8. 10.1016/0169-328X(93)90098-A [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Illarionova NB, Gunnarson E, Li Y, Brismar H, Bondar A, Zelenin S, et al. Functional and molecular interactions between aquaporins and Na, K-ATPase. Neuroscience (2010) 168:915–25. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2009.11.062 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Hinson SR, Roemer SF, Lucchinetti CF, Fryer JP, Kryzer TJ, Chamberlain JL, et al. Aquaporin-4-binding autoantibodies in patients with neuromyelitis optica impair glutamate transport by down-regulating EAAT2. J Exp Med (2008) 205:2473–81. 10.1084/jem.20081241 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Grewer C, Gameiro A, Zhang Z, Tao Z, Braams S, Rauen T. Glutamate forward and reverse transport: from molecular mechanism to transporter-mediated release after ischemia. IUBMB Life (2008) 60:609–19. 10.1002/iub.98 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Gunnarson E, Zelenina M, Axehult G, Song Y, Bondar A, Krieger P, et al. Identification of a molecular target for glutamate regulation of astrocyte water permeability. Glia (2008) 56:587–96. 10.1002/glia.20627 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Marignier R, Nicolle A, Watrin C, Touret M, Cavagna S, Varrin-Doyer M, et al. Oligodendrocytes are damaged by neuromyelitis optica immunoglobulin G via astrocyte injury. Brain (2010) 133:2578–91. 10.1093/brain/awq177 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Ikeshima-Kataoka H. Neuroimmunological implications of AQP4 in astrocytes. Int J Mol Sci (2016) 17:E1306. 10.3390/ijms17081306 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.