Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul 30;13:16. doi: 10.1186/s13722-018-0118-0

Table 1.

Percentage of participants that endorsed perceived etiology categories for the total sample and group comparisons

Category (%) Total sample (N = 119) Recovery use status Recovery pathway
AB (n = 68) MOD (n = 51) χ2 TAR (n = 53) NR (n = 66) χ2
Used cannabis to cope 43.7 47.1 39.2 0.7 54.7 34.8 4.7*
Environment/social influence 41.2 38.2 45.1 0.6 39.6 42.4 0.1
Enjoyment/boredom/positive perceptions of cannabis 23.5 20.6 27.5 0.8 13.2 31.8 5.7*
Addictive personality 14.3 11.8 17.6 0.8 17.0 12.1 0.6
Genetics/predisposition 10.1 14.7 3.9 3.7 20.8 1.5 12.0***
Habit/dependence/addiction 9.2 11.8 5.9 ns i 7.5 10.6 ns i
Loss of control 7.6 8.8 5.9 ns i 9.4 6.1 ns i
Cannabis per se causes the addiction 6.7 5.9 7.8 ns i 1.9 10.6 ns i
No problem actually existed 4.2 5.9 2.0 ns i 0.0 7.6 ns i
Denial/self-deception/ignorance/choice 3.4 1.5 5.9 ns i 3.8 3.0 ns i

Chi square values represent Pearson Chi square values. Absolute Chi square values are reported. AB abstinence; MOD moderation; NR natural recovery; TAR treatment-assisted recovery

iFisher’s exact test was used instead of Pearson Chi square because expected cell counts were less than 5

*p < .05; **p < .01; ***p < .001