Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 21;29(8):2225–2233. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2018010036

Table 2.

Adjusted Cox proportional hazards model with association between initial proteinuria reduction and composite renal end point

Variable Hazard Ratio 95% Confidence Interval P Value
Proteinuria reduction, %
 <30 1.00 (reference group) 0.40 to 1.22 0.21
 30–60 0.70 0.22 to 0.79 <0.01
 >60 0.42
Boys 0.77 0.47 to 1.25 0.29
Age, yr 1.08 1.02 to 1.15 0.01
Baseline ambulatory MAP, SDS 1.18 1.00 to 1.38 0.05
Diagnosis group
 Glomerulopathies 1.00 (reference group) 0.31 to 1.05 0.07
 CAKUT 0.57 0.38 to 1.89 0.69
 Other 0.85
Baseline eGFR, ml/min per 1.73 m2 0.93 0.91 to 0.94 <0.001
Baseline urinary protein-to-creatinine ratio, mg/mg 1.21 1.09 to 1.34 <0.001
Ambulatory MAP reduction, SDS 0.92 0.77 to 1.10 0.39

No interaction was detected between proteinuria reduction and baseline proteinuria when added to the model (P=0.12). All model parameters are shown in Supplemental Table 2. No interaction was detected between proteinuria reduction and BP reduction when added to the model (P=0.10). All model parameters are shown in Supplemental Table 3. MAP, mean arterial pressure; SDS, standard deviation score; CAKUT, congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract.