Table 2.

Analysis of significant IHC markers comparing LMS, ALM STUMP, and CLM by percentage.

Markers	%	LMS	STUMP	ALM	CLM	ULM	P
No. Cases		38	17	42	22	46
ER	0	64.9	17.6	19	0	14.6
	<33	10.8	11.8	11.9	4.5	7.3
	33–66	2.7	17.6	21.4	18.2	51.2
	>66	21.6	52.9	47.6	77.3	26.8	<0.01
PR	0	75.7	11.8	2.4	0	7.1
	<33	8.1	0	2.4	4.5	14.3
	33–66	5.4	0	11.9	27.3	33.3
	>66	10.8	88.2	83.3	68.2	45.2	<0.01
P16	0	13.2	41.2	21.4	50	55
	<33	13.2	35.3	40.5	40.9	42.5
	33–66	2.6	0	19	4.5	2.5
	>66	71.1	23.5	19	4.5	0	<0.01
p53	0	44.7	41.2	35.7	72.7	97.7
	<33	10.5	17.6	45.2	4.5	2.3
	33–66	5.3	5.9	9.5	13.6	0
	>66	39.5	35.3	9.5	9.1	0	<0.01
p21	0	8.3	0	11.1	41.2	80
	<33	69.4	50	37	52.9	20
	33–66	8.3	20	11.1	5.9	0
	>66	13.9	30	40.7	0	0	<0.01
Ki-67	0	0	0	4.8	4.5	12.8
	<33	29.7	94.1	95.2	95.5	87.2
	33–66	24.3	5.9	0	0	0
	>66	45.9	0	0	0	0	<0.01
RBL2	0	0	0	0	0	8.1
	<33	2.7	0	0	0	8.1
	33–66	13.5	10	33.3	16.7	32.4
	>66	83.8	90	66.7	83.3	51.4	<0.01
RB	0	65.8	40	34.8	73.3	86.1
	≤33	21.1	60	60.9	26.7	13.9
	>33	13.2	0	4.3	0	0	<0.01
CD24	0	94.6	100	96	100	97.5
	≤33	5.4	0	4	0	0
	>33	0	0	0	0	2.5	<0.01
pS6	0	55.3	61.5	69.6	87.5	87.2
	≤33	34.2	30.8	30.4	12.5	12.8
	>33	10.5	7.7				<0.05
pAKT	0	69.2	75	66.0	89	100
	1–100	30.8	25	34.0	11	0	<0.05
BCL2	0	24.3	5.9	4.8	4.5	10.3
	<33	27	0	7.1	4.5	33.3
	33–66	5.4	0	14.3	4.5	25.6
	>66	43.2	94.1	73.8	86.4	30.8	<0.01
HMGA2	0	89.5	82.4	90.5	81.8	89.3
	>90	10.5	17.6	9.5	18.2	10.7	<0.01
EGFR	0	10.8	45.5	30.4	31.2	59.5
	<33	5.4	9.1	17.4	25.0	24.3
	33–66	18.9	9.1	43.5	31.2	2.7
	>66	64.9	36.4	8.7	12.5	13.5	<0.01
FASCIN	0	8.3	16.7	22.5	35	40.5
	<33	5.6	5.6	5	5	18.9
	33–66	8.3	16.7	45	25	21.6
	>66	77.8	61.1	27.5	35	18.9	<0.01
c-Kit	0	89.5	100	100	100	100
	≤33	7.9	0	0	0	0
	>33	2.6	0	0	0	0	NS
PTEN	Neg	36.8	0	9.1	0	2.8
	Pos	63.2	100	90.9	100	97.2	<0.01