Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul 1;13(6):418–425. doi: 10.1089/bfm.2018.0006

Table 2.

Comparison of Breastfeeding Rates and Reasons for Not Initiating Breastfeeding Among Women Who Received Parents as Teachers Curriculum With Breastfeeding Education (PAT+) and Without (PAT)

  PAT+ (n = 59) PAT (n = 59) RR (95% CI)
Rate of breastfeeding initiation 46 (78.00) 44 (74.58) 1.05 (0.86–1.28)
Agreement with statement: “I am likely to breastfeed again if I have another child” 39 (66.10) 36 (61.01) 1.03 (0.86–1.25)
Importance of following reasons to decide not to breastfeed: PAT+ (n = 13) PAT (n = 15) RR (95% CI)
Belief formula was better than milk 3.08 (±1.19) 2.33 (±1.23) 1.30 (0.72–2.36)
Belief breastfeeding would be too inconvenient 2.31 (±1.38) 1.73 (±0.88) 1.73 (0.62–4.82)
Desire to return to school or work 2.31 (±1.32) 1.00 (±1.31) 1.92 (0.97–3.82)
Concern for low milk supply 2.08 (±1.44) 1.80 (±1.01) 1.44 (0.49–4.26)
Too many household duties 1.77 (±1.24) 0.73 (±0.96) 1.85 (0.80–4.25)
Health professional advised not to for medical reasons 1.53 (±1.03) 1.78 (±1.20) 5.19 (1.36–19.83)
On medication 0.85 (±1.34) 0.40 (±1.06) 2.31 (0.50–10.62)

Data presented n (%) or mean (±standard deviation) on a one to four scale of importance, with four denoting higher importance, unless otherwise noted.

CI, confidence interval; RR, relative risk.