Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul 30;13(7):e0200903. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0200903

Table 2. Effect of the different K application rates on the yield, K concentration and total phenol content of soybean plants in two field trials over two years.

Year K treatment Zhangjiachi Changling
Yield
(kg ha-1)
K
(%)
Phenols
(mg g-1)
Yield
(kg ha-1)
K
(%)
Phenols
(mg g-1)
K0 1338±105b 0.80±0.04b 1.12±0.05b 1505±64b 0.94±0.02c 0.94±0.11b
2012 K60 1671±94a 1.01±0.08a 1.53±0.12a 2015±135a 1.28±0.08b 1.33±0.10a
K120 1664±93a 1.14±0.06a 1.72±0.16a 1929±122a 1.59±0.07a 1.42±0.09a
K0 1534±88b 0.84±0.07c 1.10±0.08b 1409±58b 0.97±0.08c 1.02±0.13c
2013 K60 1990±98a 1.13±0.01b 1.83±0.08a 1853±65a 1.30±0.05b 1.32±0.06b
K120 1867±87a 1.27±0.07a 1.98±0.08a 1916±132a 1.67±0.07a 1.60±0.13a

Note: K0, no K application; K60, 60 kg ha-1 K; K120, 120 kg ha-1 K. All of the data are the means ± SE (n = 4). The different letters after the numbers in the same column for the same trait in the same year indicate significant differences (P<0.05) by Duncan’s t-tests.