Table 5.
Descriptive statistics: Day 2 n-back performance (N = 76).
| Group | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Measure | EC-Women (n = 17) | EC-Men (n = 19) | NoEC-Women (n = 21) | NoEC-Men (n = 19) | |
| Block 1 | |||||
| CIS | 1-back | 95.24 (6.94) | 95.74 (6.53) | 94.79 (5.61) | 96.49 (3.49) |
| 3-back | 87.50 (9.97)a | 83.21 (8.15) | 82.31 (14.92) | 87.47 (8.58) | |
| MRT | 1-back | 581.74 (130.20) | 681.72 (203.05) | 560.83 (175.51) | 606.28 (155.64) |
| 3-back | 799.33 (239.58)a | 912.45 (359.02) | 791.00 (284.22) | 853.54 (839.38) | |
| Block 2 | |||||
| CIS | 1-back | 93.00 (7.36) | 94.74 (4.73) | 95.01 (6.30) | 92.98 (15.90) |
| 3-back | 82.63 (10.10) | 79.95 (13.05) | 83.67 (11.23) | 79.70 (14.10) | |
| MRT | 1-back | 621.57 (152.20) | 704.01 (212.36) | 593.26 (173.14) | 585.08 (134.99) |
| 3-back | 848.25 (249.75) | 900.66 (382.67) | 807.83 (265.17) | 916.83 (300.42) | |
| Block 3 | |||||
| CIS | 1-back | 95.24 (4.76) | 93.99 (7.91) | 94.79 (6.55) | 92.48 (7.33) |
| 3-back | 88.24 (12.04) | 84.96 (11.91) | 82.31 (12.79) | 86.47 (9.43) | |
| MRT | 1-back | 619.26 (140.62) | 659.08 (206.56) | 602.37 (193.02) | 643.44 (183.56) |
| 3-back | 767.63 (225.19) | 772.31 (330.40) | 775.22 (317.99) | 835.55 (295.45) | |
| Block 4 | |||||
| CIS | 1-back | 93.48 (6.02) | 94.24 (7.87) | 92.52 (9.59) | 93.74 (11.88) |
| 3-back | 84.59 (9.45) | 86.72 (11.10) | 78.47 (19.66) | 79.45 (14.38) | |
| MRT | 1-back | 598.36 (97.97) | 678.71 (236.25) | 573.72 (156.81) | 620.00 (170.51) |
| 3-back | 802.66 (220.58) | 807.55 (325.61) | 748.32 (198.36) | 878.23 (317.77) | |
Note. Data presented are means, with standard deviations in parentheses. CIS, correctly identified stimuli; MRT, mean reaction time (measured in milliseconds). aData based on n = 16 participants. One participant in this group used an incorrect key to provide responses for all non-target trials in this block.