Skip to main content
. 2018 Apr 18;88:35–46. doi: 10.1016/j.curtheres.2018.04.001

Table 6.

Placebo comparator: Patient profile comparison.

Characteristics of patients at inclusion Chevalier et al8 Strand et al7* Hangody et al10 Pooled placebo Arthrum 2.5% Matching the groups§
Difference Statistics
Population, n 129 128 69 326 218
Age, y
 Mean (SD) 62.5 (9.2) 60.3 (10.0) 58.0 (9.0) 60.7 (9.5) 62.9 (12.6) –2.2 (10.8) P = 0.019
Sex, n (%)
 Men 41 (32) 51 (40) 18 (26) 110 (34) 95 (44) –10%
 Women 88 (68) 77 (60) 51 (74) 216 (66) 123 (56) 10%

KL radiologic grade of knee osteoarthritis, n (%)
 Grade I-II 51 (39) 65 (51) 55 (80) 171 (52) 118 (54) –2% χ2 = 0.86
 Grade III 78 (60) 63 (49) 14 (20) 155 (48) 99 (46) 2%
 Grade IV 1 (1) 0 0 1 (0) 0 0% P = 0.65

Body mass index
 Mean (SD) 29.8 (5.7) 28.7 (3.8) 29.1 (4.5) 29.2 (4.8) 27.2 (4.3) 2.0 (4.6) p < 0.001||

Anteriority of knee osteoarthritis, y
 Mean (SD) 5.8 (5.4) 5.8 (5.4) 4.1 (5.4) 1.7

KL= Kellgren-Lawrence.

Pooled placebo from studies by Chevalier et al,8 Hangody et al,10 and Strand et al7 (n = 326).

Strand was only effective for the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index pain subscore A, from day 30 to day 90. With Chevalier and Hangody alone (N = 198), there was no incidence on the Kellgren-Lawrence (radiologic osteoarthritis scale profile matching (χ2 = 1.12; P = 0.57) and the age criteria passed (P = 0.070).

LCA Pharmaceutical (Product group studied), Chartres, France.

§

Matching the pooled placebo group with the Arthrum 2.5% group.

||

The body mass index difference (2.0 more for placebo) was accepted as both groups were in the same body mass index category (overweight).