Skip to main content
. 2018 Apr 18;88:35–46. doi: 10.1016/j.curtheres.2018.04.001

Table 7.

Placebo comparison results.

Time Arthrum 2.5%
IA Placebo
Difference (SD) Effect size (95% CI) P value
Variation/0 d (SD) N Variation/0 d (SD) n
WOMAC A 30 22.3 (20.0) 207 17.9 (19.6) 326 4.39 (19.8) 0.22 (0.05 to 0.39) 0.013
Pain (base 100) 60 28.9 (17.4) 199 22.2 (21.7) 326 6.70 (20.2) 0.33 (0.15 to 0.51) < 0.001
90* 30.7 (17.8) 180 19.2 (24.3) 326 11.49 (22.3) 0.52 (0.34 to 0.70) < 0.001
180 33.6 (17.4) 183 21.0 (21.2) 198 12.61 (19.5) 0.65 (0.45 to 0.85) < 0.001

WOMAC C 60 23.4 (17.3) 181 21.3 (18.4) 198 2.09 (17.9) 0.12 (–0.08 to 0.32) 0.26
Function (base 100) 90* 25.6 (17.0) 160 19.4 (19.0) 198 6.17 (18.1) 0.34 (0.13 to 0.55) 0.001
180 27.6 (17.5) 165 18.0 (21.6) 198 9.57 (19.8) 0.48 (0.27 to 0.69) < 0.001

WOMAC = Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index.

Results for Arthrum 2.5% (LCA Pharmaceutical, Chartres, France) obtained at 120 days have been used in the comparison at 90 days with placebo, as justified from the stability of the measures (see Figure 6).