Table 3.

Correlations between the IAT “influence” scores and 3DMRT performance in HUM and STEM students.

	HUM	STEM
Correct responses “neutral” condition	r = -0.044	r = 0.171
	p = 0.771	p = 0.200
Correct responses “optimized for men” condition	r = 0.300	r = 0.121
	p = 0.04	p = 0.367
50o	r = 0.157	r = 0.123
	p = 0.802	p = 0.357
100o	r = 0.107	r = 0.123
	p = 0.473	p = 0.341
150o	r = 0.287	r = 0.127
	p = 0.05	p = 0.341
Correct responses “optimized for women” condition	r = 0.072	r = 0.123
	p = 0.630	p = 0.357
Expected correct responses “neutral” condition	r = 0.038	r = 0.005
	p = 0.802	p = 0.971
Expected correct responses “optimized for men” condition	r = 0.515	r = 0.092
	p < 0.000	p = 0.494
Expected correct responses “optimized for women” condition	r = 0.233	r = 0.056
	p = 0.114	p = 0.676

Pearson’s r correlation indices and associated p-values are provided. Statistically significant correlations (p < 0.05) are in bold.