Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul 31;18:124. doi: 10.1186/s12890-018-0691-8

Table 2.

Comparison of traditional pulmonary function tests and pulsed oscillatory resistance determination between the carbon dioxide retention and non-carbon dioxide retention COPD

Carbon dioxide retention (n = 86) Non-carbon dioxide retention (n = 144) p value
Z5%pred 185.9 (154–216.65) 162.4 (131.35–199.6) 0.004
R5%pred 168 (138.85–197.7) 148 (126.75–182.75) 0.008
R5 0.52 (0.43–0.61) 0.49 (0.39–0.57) 0.057
R20%pred 123.4 (105.75–139.55) 117.2 (104.3–135.6) 0.236
R20 0.32 (0.29–0.375) 0.33 (0.29–0.37) 0.764
R5-R20 0.18 (0.125–0.23) 0.14 (0.09–0.205) 0.009
X5 −0.24 (−0.31--0.16) −0.19 (− 0.32--0.13) 0.022
Fres 22 (18.26–26.19) 21.2 (17.48–24.61) 0.173
Ax 1.89 (1.27–2.57) 1.54 (0.74–2.44) 0.011
FEV1 0.95 (0.77–1.42) 1.39 (1.06–1.74) < 0.001
FEV1%pred 34.25 (25.4–47.8) 51.45 (40–61.7) < 0.001
FEV1/FVC 48.14 (42.08–56.71) 56.26 (46.55–62.79) < 0.001
MMEF75–25%pred 14.25 (9.7–19.9) 21.5 (16.1–27.75) < 0.001
DLCO/VA 75.47 ± 24.29 80.13 ± 24.34 0.169
RV/TLC 59.44 ± 10.11 55.98 ± 10.63 0.017

Abbreviations: PFT Pulmonary function test, FEV1 forced expiratory volume in 1 sec, FVC forced vital capacity, FEV1/FVC forced expiratory volume in 1 sec/forced vital capacity, MMEF25–75% maximal mid expiratory flow, RV/TLC residual volume/total lung capacity, DLCO/VA ratio of carbon monoxide diffusion capacity to alveolar ventilation, %Pred, of the predicted value, Z5 Total respiratory impedance, R5 resistance at 5 Hz, R20 resistance at 20 Hz, X5 reactance at 5 Hz, Fres response frequency, Ax reactance area