Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jul 31.
Published in final edited form as: J Chem Inf Model. 2018 Mar 9;58(3):605–614. doi: 10.1021/acs.jcim.7b00588

Table 7.

Results from Five Independent Apo Docking Experimentsa

1M7D/1 1M7I/1 1UZ6/8
Run 1 N.A.Pb 4 (1,2,3,8)d 3 (1,2,3) 4 (1,4,14,15)
L.R.A. PRMSDc 2.0 (1) 1.5 (1) 1.0 (1)
Run 2 N.A.P 3 (1,2,3) 4 (1,3,5,19) 3 (1,2,11)
L.R.A. PRMSD 1.9 (1) 1.5 (1) 1.0 (1)
Run 3 N.A.P 4 (1,2,3,4) 3 (1,8,14) 3 (1,4,12)
L.R.A. PRMSD 1.9 (1) 1.5 (1) 1.0 (1)
Run 4 N.A.P 4 (1,2,3,18) 1(1) 5 (1,4,9,14,15)
L.R.A. PRMSD 2.0 (1) 1.5 (1) 1.0 (1)
Run 5 N.A.P 4 (1,2,3,4) 4 (1,2,3,17) 3 (1,4,10)
L.R.A. PRMSD 1.9 (1) 1.5 (1) 1.0 (1)
a

RMSD values are in Å.

b

N.A.P represents the total number of acceptable poses in each individual docking experiment.

c

L.R.A. PRMSD represents lowest ranked acceptable pose RMSD (Å) in each individual docking experiment.

d

Numbers in parentheses represent the ranks of the poses in each individual docking experiment.