Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jul 31.
Published in final edited form as: Soc Sci Res. 2016 Feb 13;58:80–103. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2015.08.010

Channels and barriers effects from the PEACH model.a

Pre-transition Transition Post-transition
Male: Agriculture – Education −1.429*** (0.188) −1.289*** (0.188) −0.649*** (0.173)
Female: Agriculture – Education −2.656*** (0.219) −1.112*** (0.145) −0.823*** (0.151)
Male: Agriculture – Autonomy −1.61* (0.788) −2.104*** (0.369) −2.734*** (0.372)
Female: Agriculture – Autonomy 0.405 (0.807) −0.287 (0.344) 0.012 (0.336)
Male: Agriculture – Education sector 0.803** (0.304) 0.612 (0.323) 0.379 (0.361)
Female: Agriculture – Education sector 1.538*** (0.2) 0.494** (0.174) 0.54** (0.206)
Male: Education – Education sector −0.976* (0.404) −0.358 (0.251) 0.51* (0.233)
Female: Education – Education sector −0.931*** (0.267) −0.857*** (0.168) −0.522*** (0.139)
Male: Agriculture – Construction 1.282*** (0.221) 1.038*** (0.232) 0.964** (0.312)
Female: Agriculture – Construction −0.554 (0.743) 0.567 (0.929) −0.619(1.441)
Male: Construction – Agriculture 1.53*** (0.326) 0.152 (0.372) −0.581 (0.437)
Female: Construction – Agriculture 1.489*** (0.341) 1.61*** (0.393) 0.55 (0.649)
Male: Machine industry – Agriculture −1.616* (0.633) −1.226* (0.595) −1.079* (0.482)
Female: Machine industry – Agriculture −1.091 (0.656) 0.051 (0.7) −0.913 (0.783)
a

Model estimated on data sets listed in Table 2, and includes period- and gender-specific marginals. Other effects and fit statistics are listed in Table 6.

*

p < 0.05

**

p < 0.01

***

p < 0.001.