Table 4.
6-Month abstinence rates by treatment group and 1-month mediator
| Type of Mediator | Not Endorsed/Used (in %) | Endorsed/Used (in %) | Difference of the difference | p of interaction term | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | Text2Quit | Control | Text2Quit | |||
| Psychosocial | ||||||
| Gave me confidence that I can quit smoking | 17.5 | 24.0 | 28.4 | 42.8 | 7.8 | 0.23 |
| Made me think that it was worthwhile for me to quit | 22.2 | 22.2 | 21.4 | 40.6 | 19.1 | 0.03* |
| Made me feel that someone cared if I quit | 19.7 | 27.0 | 24.4 | 40.6 | 8.8 | 0.17 |
| Made me feel that I knew the right steps to take to quit | 19.3 | 18.4 | 24.7 | 42.7 | 18.8 | 0.02* |
| Outside Resource | ||||||
| Quit smoking medication(s) | 17.8 | 40.9 | 31.2 | 33.3 | −21.0 | 0.02* |
| Telephone help/quit line | 22.0 | 36.0 | 19.1 | 54.2 | 21.2 | 0.20 |
| Self-help materials, books, or videos | 25.3 | 39.5 | 10.2 | 33.3 | 9.0 | 0.18 |
| Online quit smoking community | 20.8 | 33.7 | 25.6 | 58.3 | 19.8 | 0.18 |
Note: For the ease of this table, responses to the single-item psychosocial mediators measures were dichotomized, where “completely disagree”, “disagree” and “neither agree nor disagree” responses were coded as “not endorsed” and “agree” and “completely agree” were coded as “endorsed”.
Logistic regression models were run for each mediator, where ABSTINENCE = GROUP MEDIATOR GROUP*MEDIATOR; the p-values for the GROUP*MEDIATOR term is provided here