Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2018 Jan 31;14(3):241–249. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2018.1428369

Table 1.

Description of participant characteristics including etiology, duration of neurological disorder, current age, gender, self-reported vertical and horizontal visual impairment, primary mode of communication, and message preference.

ID Etiology Duration (years) Age (years) Gender Oculomotor vertical Impairment horizontal Primary AAC Preference Message
P1 ALS 5 45 M no no Eye-tracking Spelling
P2 ALS 27 61 M no* no Mouthing Spelling
P3 TBI 9 31 M no no Blinking Phrases / Symbols
P4 PSP 3 64 F yes no Gestures Spelling / Phrases
P5 BS 13 29 M no yes Vertical Eye Movement Phrases / Symbols

Participants P3, P4 and P5 all had significant oculomotor impairment associated with their disorder (even though P3 did not report any visual deficits) while P1 and P2 were able to control an eye-gaze tracking AAC device to some extent.

*

P2 reported no oculomotor deficits, but presented with a ptosis of the right eye. Abbreviations: brainstem stroke (BS); progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP), traumatic brain injury (TBI); amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS).