Skip to main content
. 2017 Oct 11;596(15):3171–3185. doi: 10.1113/JP273805

Table 2.

Heart rate variability analysis

Sham Pre Post
SDNN (ms) 14 ± 1 13 ± 1
Total power (ms2) 200 ± 31 187 ± 37
LF (nu) 27 ± 5 25 ± 3
HF (nu) 47 ± 3 40 ± 2
LF/HF ratio 0.6 ± 0.1 0.6 ± 0.1
CHF‐empty Pre‐pace CHF CHF post‐virus
SDNN (ms) 14 ± 1 9 ± 1* 8 ± 1*#
Total power (ms2) 192 ± 30 66 ± 14* 70 ± 22*#
LF (nu) 22 ± 4 25 ± 3 30 ± 5
HF (nu) 36 ± 5 25 ± 3 26 ± 4#
LF/HF ratio 0.6 ± 0.1 1.0 ± 0.1* 1.2 ± 0.2*#
CHF‐KLF2 Pre‐pace CHF CHF post‐virus
SDNN (ms) 15 ± 1 10 ± 1* 15 ± 2
Total power (ms2) 196 ± 47 91 ± 15* 210 ± 49
LF (nu) 19 ± 3 23 ± 4 22 ± 3
HF (nu) 39 ± 3 27 ± 2* 43 ± 4
LF/HF ratio 0.5 ± 0.1 0.8 ± 0.1* 0.5 ± 0.1
Scrambled siRNA Pre‐virus Post‐virus
SDNN (ms) 14 ± 3 15 ± 4
Total power (ms2) 185 ± 78 233 ± 125
LF (nu) 31 ± 3 25 ± 3
HF (nu) 49 ± 3 39 ± 3
LF/HF ratio 0.7 ± 0.1 0.7 ± 0.1
KLF2 siRNA Pre‐virus Post‐virus
SDNN (ms) 14 ± 2 12 ± 1
Total power (ms2) 194 ± 38 159 ± 25
LF (nu) 19 ± 3 29 ± 3*
HF (nu) 46 ± 3 35 ± 3*
LF/HF ratio 0.4 ± 0.1 0.9 ± 0.2*

SDNN = standard deviation of the normalized RR interval; LF = low‐frequency power; HF = high‐frequency power; nu = normalized units. * P < 0.05 compared to respective baseline condition (pre‐pace or pre‐virus), # P < 0.05 compared to sham, P < 0.05 compared to CHF. n = 8 rabbits per group, except scrambled siRNA (n = 6).