Skip to main content
. 2018 May 19;596(15):3217–3232. doi: 10.1113/JP275804

Table 1.

Values for sympathetic nerve activity, mean arterial pressure and heart rate at before (i.e. baseline) and after the termination of the protocol (i.e. 60 min after) recording

SNA (μV) MAP (mmHg) HR (beats min–1)
Treatment groups n Baseline Baseline Post Baseline Post
Time control 5 3.55 ± 0.36 99 ± 6 97 ± 6 457 ± 18 449 ± 17
Losartan control 4 3.44 ± 0.57 89 ± 6 88 ± 9 477 ± 12 467 ± 12
AIH + Saline 5 3.34 ± 0.25 101 ± 9 107 ± 8 446 ± 10 463 ± 11
AIH + Losartan 5 3.43 ± 0.24 88 ± 11 90 ± 6 439 ± 18 437 ± 9
AIH + Aliskiren 4 3.98 ± 0.50 98 ± 4 95 ± 4 431 ± 10 427 ± 8
Int.Saline 4 3.21 ± 0.11 110 ± 8 109 ± 4 436 ± 3 436 ± 7
Int.Ang II 5 3.18 ± 0.15 100 ± 5 110 ± 4 433 ± 5 448 ± 7
Int.Ang II + Losartan 4 3.25 ± 0.46 90 ± 5 91 ± 7 441 ± 16 432 ± 11
Single Ang II 4 3.17 ± 0.19 102 ± 5 105 ± 6 414 ± 19 414 ± 20
Continuous Ang II 4 3.17 ± 0.18 99 ± 8 101 ± 5 429 ± 7 432 ± 11
AIH + Sham 4 3.34 ± 0.40 101 ± 8 105 ± 6 463 ± 8 468 ± 11
AIH + CBD 6 3.21 ± 0.34 96 ± 4 99 ± 5 486 ± 7 476 ± 10
AIH + SFOvehicle 4 3.49 ± 0.33 92 ± 8 85 ± 9 439 ± 8 444 ± 10
AIH + SFOmiss 4 3.19 ± 0.13 102 ± 1 96 ± 3 471 ± 7 476 ± 10
AIH + SFOiso 6 3.28 ± 0.25 112 ± 5 105 ± 7 472 ± 5 471 ± 8
AIH + CBD∙SFOiso 6 3.71 ± 0.48 96 ± 3 91 ± 4 478 ± 7 460 ± 10
Int.Ang II + Sham 6 3.00 ± 0.27 104 ± 6 106 ± 5 450 ± 20 449 ± 18
Int.Ang II + CBD 5 3.50 ± 0.27 110 ± 3 114 ± 4 458 ± 10 461 ± 11
Int.Ang II + SFOiso 6 4.10 ± 0.35 102 ± 4 100 ± 5 484 ± 10 479 ± 11
Int.Ang II + CBD∙SFOiso 4 3.80 ± 0.54 91 ± 6 92 ± 5 464 ± 9 468 ± 13
Int.Phenylephrine 5 3.32 ± 0.41 101 ± 8 101 ± 13 426 ± 8 427 ± 3
Int.Phenylephrine + Aliskiren 4 3.10 ± 0.17 108 ± 6 112 ± 6 431 ± 6 428 ± 4
Continuous phenylephrine 4 3.21 ± 0.13 103 ± 7 102 ± 8 410 ± 3 407 ± 6
Int.Sodium nitroprusside 6 3.31 ± 0.26 115 ± 6 115 ± 7 433 ± 5 432 ± 8

Values are in mean ± SEM. One‐way ANOVA with Holm–Šidák correction was used for multiple comparisons between groups for baseline SNA, MAP and HR values. Two‐way ANOVA with Holm–Šidák correction was used for multiple comparisons between baseline and post‐protocol values for MAP and HR values. There were no differences between all comparisons.