Skip to main content
. 2018 May 11;80(7):1108–1115. doi: 10.1292/jvms.17-0623

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Comparison of the PSL-ILM thickness of the retinas between Group A (n=7), Group B (n=7), Group C (n=9) and Control Group D (n=3); each group result represents average ± SD. Significant difference (P<0.001) was noted between Group C and Group D, Group D and control Group D.