Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 12;9(8):956–966. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.12771

Table 3.

Relationship between CTCs and ESCC clinicopathological features

Total CTC P Epithelial CTC P Hybrid CTC P Mesenchymal CTC P
M IQR M IQR M IQR M IQR
Total 20 12–39 1 0–3 16 6–33 1 0–4
Age < 65 16 12–32.75 0.072 0.5 0–3 0.136 14 6–27.75 0.095 1 0–4.5 0.375
≥ 65 22 13–54 1 0–3 17 8–42 2 0–4
Gender Male 23 12–38.75 0.741 1 0–2.75 0.753 17 6–32.75 0.728 2 0–5 0.123
Female 19 12–39 1 0–3 14 6–35 1 0–4
T Staging Stage I and II 17.5 7.75–41.75 0.482 1 0–4 0.289 14.5 5.75–36.5 0.791 1 0–2 0.005
Stage III and IV 21 14–38.5 1 0–2 16 8.5–31.5 3 0.5–6
N Staging Stage 0 20.5 10.5–43.25 0.799 1 0–3 0.656 17 6–37.5 0.582 1 0–4.75 0.942
Stage I and II 20 12–37 1 0–3 15 6–31 2 0–4
Clinical staging Stage I 14 7.5–43.25 0.524 1 0–3.75 0.557 12.5 6–37.5 0.818 0 0–1.75 0.028
Stage II 21.5 11–34.25 1 0–3.25 17 5–31.25 2 0–4.25
Stage III 22 17–39 1 0–2 16 10–32 3 0–7.5
Treatment modality§ Non‐surgical 20.5 12.78–36 0.722 0 0–1.75 0.314 16 7.25–30.5 0.917 3.5 2–5.75 0.011
Surgical 18.5 7.75–41.75 1 0–3 15.5 5.75–36.5 1 0–3
Tumor location Upper segment 16 7–39 0.714 1 0–3 0.860 15 6–29 0.844 1 0–3 0.517
Middle segment 20 12–38.25 1 0–4 16.5 6–32.25 2 0–4.25
Lower segment 38.5 3.25–48.5 1 0–1.25 36.5 0–42.25 2 0.75–5.5

Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (two‐tailed).

Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (two‐tailed).

§

Cervical esophageal cancer patients were excluded. CTC, circulating tumor cell; ESCC, esophageal squamous cell carcinoma; IQR, interquartile range.