Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul 5;51(Pt 4):1050–1058. doi: 10.1107/S1600576718007343

Table 1. Crystallographic data of the candidate pseudo-hexagonal minerals.

The columns contain the crystal system S (O = orthorhombic, M = monoclinic), the unit-cell parameters (a, b, c, β), the pinacoid face entering the pseudo-hexagonal morphology and the corresponding prism faces. The last two columns contain, respectively, the pinacoid/prism angle and the prism/prism angle. For aragonite, the (110) penetration and contact twins have been used for calculations. In the penetration twin, the ‘pinacoid face’ is made of two slightly misoriented (110) faces having the average orientation of the (010) pinacoid. In the contact twin, the faces labeled ‘pinacoid’ are the (110) faces of the next individual of the twin (*). See Fig. 7 for further discussion

Mineral S a b c β pin pri1 pri2 pin^pri pri1^pri2
Barite O 8.8842 5.4559 7.1569 90 (001) (011) (01Inline graphic) 52.6807 74.6385
Celestine O 8.3770 5.3500 6.8730 90 (001) (011) (01Inline graphic) 52.1025 75.7950
Gypsum M 6.2840 15.2000 6.5230 127.410 (010) (120) (1Inline graphic0) 56.7044 66.5912
Mirabilite M 1.5120 10.3700 12.8470 107.789 (010) (110) (Inline graphic10) 43.4114 86.8228
Aragonite (penetration) O 4.9614 7.9671 5.7404 90 (010) (110) (1Inline graphic0) 58.0880 63.8240
Aragonite (contact) O 4.9614 7.9671 5.7404 90 (110)* (110) (1Inline graphic0) 52.352 63.8240
Strontianite O 5.1075 8.4138 6.0269 90 (010) (Inline graphic10) (Inline graphic Inline graphic0) 58.7407 62.5186
Nahcolite M 7.5100 9.7000 3.5300 93.320 (010) (110) (1Inline graphic0) 52.2986 75.4028
Borax M 1.8580 10.6740 12.1970 106.680 (010) (Inline graphic10) (Inline graphic Inline graphic0) 43.2191 93.5617