Table 5.
Accuracies obtained using different numbers of APs in the third scenario.
| APs | C1 | C2 | C3 | C4 | C5 | 
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | 89.2% | 90.9% | 85.4% | 85.0% | 90.0% | 
| 4 | 95.0% | 96.6% | 94.3% | 96.0% | 94.6% | 
| 5 | 99.3% | 89.2% | 99.1% | 99.3% | 98.0% | 
Accuracies obtained using different numbers of APs in the third scenario.
| APs | C1 | C2 | C3 | C4 | C5 | 
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | 89.2% | 90.9% | 85.4% | 85.0% | 90.0% | 
| 4 | 95.0% | 96.6% | 94.3% | 96.0% | 94.6% | 
| 5 | 99.3% | 89.2% | 99.1% | 99.3% | 98.0% |