Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 21;18(7):1982. doi: 10.3390/s18071982

Table 4.

Comparative results of the CRO-5SL and alternative metaheuristic performance (in terms of the objective function given by Equation (1)).

Algorithm Best Fitness
CRO-5SL 39.9009
HS 9.4808
GA (2PX crossover) 9.4376
ES (GM) 11.0827
DE 9.8170