Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 21;15(7):1295. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15071295

Table 1.

Abundance of antibiotic resistant * enteric microorganisms in wastewater samples collected from the vegetative treatment system.

Event/Date Water Source Number of Samples Tetracycline Resistant G Enteric Bacteria Cefotaxime Resistant G Enteric Bacteria
log CFU/mL SD Range CFU/mL
Year 1 Rainwater Runoff 3 1.75 0.05 None Detected
Spring Feedlot Wastewater 18 5.12 0.21 None Detected
Excess Wastewater 6 5.20 0.14 None Detected
Year 1 Rainwater Runoff 6 1.87 0.57 None Detected
Summer Feedlot Wastewater 21 4.65 0.23 None Detected
Excess Wastewater 11 4.82 0.36 None Detected
Year 2 Rainwater Runoff 12 1.12 0.16 None Detected
Spring Feedlot Wastewater 24 5.08 0.18 0 to 180
Excess Wastewater 3 4.95 0.04 40 to 160
Year 2 Rainwater Runoff --- --- --- ---
Summer Feedlot Wastewater 9 3.11 0.39 None Detected
Excess Wastewater 9 2.65 0.33 None Detected
Year 3 Rainwater Runoff 9 1.50 0.39 None Detected
Spring Feedlot Wastewater 12 3.54 0.22 0 to 20
Excess Wastewater 6 3.65 0.27 0 to 20
Year 3 Rainwater Runoff --- --- --- ---
Summer Feedlot Wastewater 10 3.41 0.35 None Detected
Excess Wastewater 9 3.59 0.31 None Detected

* Resistance defined for the purpose of this study as growth in the presence of 16 μg mL−1 tetracycline, or 4 μg mL−1 cefotaxime. Rainwater Runoff is rainfall runoff from the treatment cells prior to wastewater application; Feedlot Wastewater is runoff collected from the surface of beef cattle feedlot pens and applied to the treatment cells on the day of sampling; Excess Wastewater is wastewater that has not infiltrated during application and runoff of the treatment area. no rainwater runoff available for collection.