Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul 16;2018:4621015. doi: 10.1155/2018/4621015

Table 3.

Subgroup analysis of pooled HRs for overall survival in patients with low PINX1 expression.

Stratified analysis No. of cohorts No. of patients Pooled HR (95.0% CI) P value Heterogeneity
I 2 (%) P value Model
Tumor type
 Colorectal cancer 2 169 2.28 (1.46 – 3.56) <0.001 0.0 0.961 Fixed
 Non-small cell lung cancer 3 302 1.48 (1.06 – 2.08) 0.023 0.0 0.567 Fixed
 Other 6 1,807 1.36 (0.74 – 2.50) 0.931 <0.001 Random
Sample size
 ≤150 4 435 1.23 (0.52 – 2.88) 0.635 94.5 <0.001 Random
 >150 7 1,843 1.70 (1.15 – 2.50) 0.007 88.2 <0.001 Random
Test method
 IHC only 6 568 1.34 (0.73 – 2.46) 0.341 80.4 <0.001 Random
 IHC + TMA 5 1,710 1.72 (1.05 – 2.84) 0.032 85 <0.001 Random
Cutoff value
 Staining index ≤4 4 1,424 0.30 (-0.22 – 0.82) 0.255 85.5 <0.001 Random
 Stained cells <65.0% 7 854 0.49 (-0.12 – 1.10) 0.116 83.8 <0.001 Random
Type of analysis
 Univariate 7 851 1.61 (0.86 – 3.03) 0.136 87.8 <0.001 Random
 Multivariate 4 1,427 1.40 (0.86 – 2.29) 0.178 87.3 <0.001 Random
NOS score
 ≤6 6 859 1.48 (0.83 – 2.65) 0.186 84.7 <0.001 Random
 >6 5 1,419 1.55 (0.87 – 2.74) 0.134 84.9 <0.001 Random

CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; IHC, immunohistochemistry; No., number; NOS, Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale; TMA, tissue microarray.