Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul 31;6:44. doi: 10.1186/s40560-018-0313-9

Table 3.

Comparison of parameters between the success group and failure group

Total Success Failure p value
n = 173 n = 162 n = 11
Female, n (%) 59 (34.1) 55 (34.0) 4 (36.4) 0.696*
Age (years) 68.2 ± 12.8 68.2 ± 12.9 69.3 ± 11.7 0.854
APACHE II score 17.6 ± 5.7 17.2 ± 5.3 23.4 ± 8.7 0.015
BMI 23.9 ± 4.2 24.1 ± 4.2 22.1 ± 3.8 0.075
HR (bpm) 77 ± 13.5 76.3 ± 13.1 87.1 ± 15.6 0.018
RR (/min) 16.1 ± 4.7 15.7 ± 4.1 23.3 ± 7.0 0.000
TV (mL) 457.4 ± 102.3 461 ± 98.8 405.4 ± 140.6 0.031
RSBI 38.4 ± 18.3 36.6 ± 15.7 64.3 ± 31.8 0.002
PEEP (cmH2O) 6.1 ± 1.4 6.2 ± 1.3 5.3 ± 2.4 0.065
SpO2 (%) 99.2 ± 1.0 99.2 ± 0.98 98.6 ± 1.4 0.076
EtCO2 (mmHg) 39.3 ± 5.2 39.4 ± 4.8 37.8 ± 9.3 0.828
LTC (mL/cmH2O) 70.1 ± 23.6 71.9 ± 23.0 43.3 ± 14.6 < 0.0001

Mann-Whitney U Test was applied. *Fischer’s exact test was applied for the comparison of ratios. From age to LTC, data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation

APACHE II score Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score, BMI body mass index, HR heart rate, RR respiratory rate, TV tidal volume, RSBI rapid shallow breathing index, PEEP positive end-expiratory pressure, SpO2 arterial oxygen saturation, EtCO2 end-tidal carbon dioxide, LTC lung-thorax compliance