Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul 31;18:132. doi: 10.1186/s12905-018-0623-z

Table 3.

Multivariate logistic regression analysis of potential associated factors and lifetime Pap smear testing experience (N = 700)

Have undergone pap smear testing OR (95% CI) P value AOR (95% CI) P value
Total 383
Age (years)
 20–23 53 1 (ref) 1 (ref)
 24–27 181 1.75 1.16–2.65 < 0.01 1.44 0.85–2.44 0.17
 28–29 149 2.3 1.49–3.55 < 0.001 1.86 1.08–3.21 < 0.05
Employment status
 Unemployed/student 12 1 (ref) 1 (ref)
 Part-time job 66 1.1 0.54–2.23 0.859 1.91 0.82–4.43 0.740
 Full-time job 302 2.8 1.25–5.42 < 0.005 3.30 1.46–7.45 < 0.01
Income
 < 2,000,000 yen 129 1 (ref) 1 (ref)
 < 4,000,000 yen 184 1.68 1.22–2.32 < 0.005 0.92 0.58–1.47 0.13
 ≥4,000,000 yen 70 3.75 2.22–6.34 < 0.001 1.60 0.83–3.09 < 0.001
Lifetime number of sex partners
 1 73 1 (ref) 1 (ref)
 2–4 158 1.88 1.29–2.75 < 0.005 1.39 0.89–2.17 0.15
 ≥5 152 2.56 1.72–3.81 < 0.001 1.97 1.22–3.20 < 0.01
Concerns regarding STI
 Yes 220 2.08 1.39–3.13 < 0.005 1.34 0.92–1.95
 No 163 1 (ref) 1 (ref) 0.13
History of HPV vaccination
 Yes 340 3.22 1.66–6.21 < 0.001 4.88 2.19–10.89
 No/do not know 43 1 (ref) 1 (ref) < 0.001
Receipt of a coupon for cervical cancer screening from the local government
 Yes 308 5.03 3.23–7.81 < 0.001 3.14 2.12–4.64
 No 75 1 (ref) 1 (ref) < 0.001
Perceived susceptibility to cervical cancer
 Low 45 1 (ref) 1 (ref)
 Middle 124 1.63 1.05–2.52 < 0.05 1.77 1.04–3.01 < 0.05
 High 214 4.06 2.63–6.28 < 0.001 3.23 1.89–5.51 < 0.001
Perceived logistical barriers to cervical cancer screening
 Low 138 1 (ref) 1 (ref)
 Middle 139 0.46 0.57–0.33 < 0.001 0.55 0.34–0.90 < 0.05
 High 106 0.22 0.14–0.31 < 0.001 0.31 0.19–0.50 < 0.001
Confidence of undergoing cervical cancer screening from a male physician
 Low 109 1 (ref) 1 (ref)
 Middle 116 1.33 0.89–1.97 0.19 1.34 0.85–2.13 0.21
 High 92 3.36 2.29–4.94 < 0.001 2.66 1.70–4.19 < 0.001

OR adjusted odds ratio, STI sexually transmitted infections, HPV human papillomavirus