Table 3.
Family | Species | Shade tolerance | I | II | III | IV | V | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Secondary development | No. of rings | Secondary development | No. of rings | Secondary development | No. of rings | Secondary development | No. of rings | Secondary development | No. of rings | |||
Sapindaceae | ||||||||||||
Acer negundo | Low | – | – | – | – | – | – | 100 | 0.6 | 100 | 2.3 | |
Acer rubrum | Moderate | – | – | – | – | 30 | – | 100 | 0.5 | 100 | 1.9 | |
Acer saccharum | High | – | – | 20 | – | 100 | 0.3 | 100 | 1.5 | 100 | 3 | |
Betulaceae | ||||||||||||
Betula lenta | Low | – | – | 29 | – | 87 | – | 100 | – | 100 | – | |
Betula alleghaniensis | Moderate | – | – | – | – | 10 | – | 90 | – | 100 | 1.5 | |
Fagaceae | ||||||||||||
Quercus rubra | Low–moderate | – | – | – | – | 20 | – | 100 | – | 100 | 0.8 | |
Quercus alba | Moderate | – | – | – | – | 60 | – | 100 | 0.4 | 100 | 2.2 | |
Pinaceae | ||||||||||||
Pinus virginiana | Low | – | – | – | – | 100 | 0.4 | 100 | 0.7 | 100 | 1.3 | |
Pinus strobus | Moderate | – | – | – | – | 100 | – | 100 | – | 100 | 1 |
Ten roots from each branch order from plots were selected for observations.
(–) indicates that no roots in the designated root order had secondary development or growth rings. Mean square error was ±0.16 for secondary development based on percentile data and ±0.32 for no. of rings.