Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep;94(3):1057–1068. doi: 10.1124/mol.117.111443

TABLE 3.

Discovery Studio Bayesian model training and test set statistics for each probe substrate and consensus of metformin, NBD-MTMA, TEA, and cimetidine

Training/Test ROC LOO ROC
(5-fold) Sensitivity Specificity Concordance
Metformin Training 0.840 0.802 0.875 0.854 0.858
Test 0.848 0.643 0.833 0.800
MPP Training 0.815 0.779 0.919 0.658 0.683
Test 0.619 0.667 0.514 0.525
NBD-MTMA Training 0.844 0.806 0.896 0.833 0.845
Test 0.837 0.857 0.636 0.675
TEA Training 0.815 0.789 0.895 0.857 0.863
Test 0.800 0.867 0.754 0.775
Cimetidine Training 0.827 0.784 0.969 0.758 0.800
Test 0.806 0.813 0.766 0.775
ASP Training 0.806 0.768 0.959 0.741 0.791
Test 0.838 0.842 0.803 0.813
Consensus Training 0.836 0.798 0.884 0.861 0.865
Test 0.823 0.857 0.667 0.700

LOO, leave-one-out.