Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Dev Econ. 2015 Aug 19;117:151–170. doi: 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2015.07.008

Table A-3.

Impact of Amount Received as Trustee in 2002

Dependent
variable
Correlation
coefficient
Regression
coefficient
#
Obs.
ALTRUISM
sent as dictator in anonymous game in 2007 0.204** 0.098 (0.059) [0.085]* 103
sent as dictator in chosen non-revealed game in 2007 0.162 0.123** (0.060) [0.214] 103

TRUST
sent as dictator in revealed game in 2007 0.179* 0.116* (0.067) [0.068]* 103
sent as dictator in chosen revealed game in 2007 0.179* 0.144** (0.061) [0.123] 103

RECIPROCITY
positive reciprocity in 2010 −0.094 0.003 (0.014) [0.875] 43
negative reciprocity in 2010 0.032 −0.002 (0.014) [0.902] 43

Notes: Heteroskedasticity robust standard errors are in parentheses. Wild cluster bootrap p-values are in brackets.

Per-comparison significance: ***p <0.01,

**

p <0.05,

*

p <0.10.

FDR q-values: +++ q <0.01,

++

q <0.05,

+

q <0.10 calculated for 6 hypotheses within table and column.

In regression column these are based on the heteroskedasticity robust standard errors. Controls in regressions include log income, sex, age, education, amount respondent sent as trustor in 2002, share returned by respondent as trustee in 2002, and village fixed effects.