Table 4. Validated predictors of PROs.
| Entries are % increase in the mean score with 95% C.I. | Number of Medical Comorbidities | Overall Symptom Burden (TMSAS) | Functional Well-Beinga (HCV-PRO) | PROMIS Fatigue T-score | PROMIS Sleep Disturbance T-score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Older Age | 2.7 [2.1, 3.4] | ||||
| Female | 13 [5, 22] | 6 [3, 9] | |||
| White race | 9 [6, 13] | ||||
| Other race | 10 [4, 17] | ||||
| Unemployed | 29 [12, 45] | -11 [-17, -4] | 10 [4,16] | ||
| Disabled | 53 [36, 71] | 41 [31, 51] | -15 [-19, -11] | 9 [5, 13] | 10 [6, 13] |
| APRI > 2 | -6 [-11, -2] | ||||
| Currently on Psych Meds | 33 [19, 48] | -11 [-17, -6] | 7 [2, 13] | 8 [3, 13] | |
| History of Psych Meds | 7 [2, 12] |
a For the HCV-PRO, higher scores are better; estimates reflect the % decrease in HCV-PRO score (lower well-being).