Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Atten Percept Psychophys. 2016 Nov;78(8):2313–2319. doi: 10.3758/s13414-016-1204-6

Table 1.

Mean underestimation ratios for dots as a function of target numerosity. Values in brackets represent 95% confidence intervals of the mean.

Mean underestimation ratio
30 dots 85.2% [82%–88%]
60 dots 85.4% [83%–87%]
90 dots 86.0% [84%–87%]