Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar 12;5(1):13–30. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2018.1.13

Table 1. Data extraction questions, focus and coding developed for the review.

Key questions Could the theory help to inform interventions seeking to address populations (e.g., change conditions of risk?) Could the theory help to inform interventions seeking to address social determinants of health? Could application of the theory generate evidence to inform policy/practice change at a population level?
Key focus Population health provides insights into the needs of populations, rather than the needs of individuals [22]. Population health interventions are intended to change the social-cultural and environmental conditions of risk to support the overall health of populations and reduce health inequities [5],[15]. The social determinants of health influence the health of populations. Although variously defined, one definition includes income and social status; social support networks; education; employment/working conditions; social environments; physical environments; personal health practices and coping skills; healthy child development; gender; and culture [16]. Population health research is aimed at generating relevant, contextually sensitive, credible and timely knowledge to enable decision makers to use evidence to improve policies and programs that prevent disease at a population level [5].
Coding definitions Yes, if macro (e.g., societal, policy) and community-level factors are considered, including a focus on populations and systems. Possibly, if remains focused on more micro (e.g., individual) or organizational levels. Yes, if social determinants of health are considered and integrated into components of the theory/framework. Possibly, if social determinants of health are not explicitly considered in the components of the theory/framework. Yes, if application of theory/framework could result in useful information to inform policy/practice change. Possibly, if application of theory/framework focused more on research utilization and does not seem likely to be useful for policy/practice change.