Table 5.
Feasibility and perceived appropriateness of direct nutrition counseling through mobile phone (n=275).
Call center outcomes | n (%) | ||
Received all calls from the call centera | 92 (33.4) | ||
Ever missed any call from the call center | 183 (66.5) | ||
Reasons for failing to receive a voice message |
|
||
|
Was busy with household chores | 108 (59.0) | |
Mobile was out of charge | 61 (33.3) | ||
Other family members spoke to the counselor (at least once) | 80 (29.1) | ||
Called the call center on her own (at least once) | 151 (50.9) | ||
Reasons for not calling the call center |
|
||
|
Didn’t feel the need | 114 (84.5) | |
Satisfied with the counseling and response to queries | 221 (95.2) | ||
Counseling was appropriate as per pregnancy and child age | 270 (98.2) | ||
Frequency of counseling was appropriate | 215 (78.2) | ||
Direct counseling should be more frequent | 60 (21.9) | ||
Amount of information in each counseling was appropriate | 270 (98.2) | ||
Preference for nutrition communication medium |
|
||
|
Voice messaging | 14 (5.1) | |
Direct counseling from the call center | 90 (32.7) | ||
|
Both | 171 (62.2) |
aThe total number of counseling calls was 12.