Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 2;11:546. doi: 10.1186/s13104-018-3647-4

Table 3.

Mutations and genotypes found in the SLC26A4 gene

SLC26A4 mutations dbSNP na ClinVar status Pathogenicity scoresb Compound heterozygosity Double heterozygosity DFNB4 associationc
GJB2 GJB6 MT-RNR1 OR (95%CI) p value
c.-66C>G rs17154282 13 Benign/Likely benign 2 (FunSeq)
4 (RegulomeDB)
c.-103T>C; p.Asn324Tyr; p.Val609Gly c.35delG/wt; c.35delG/c.35delG D13S1854 ND 0.33 (0.09–1.05) p = 0.03684
c.-103T>C rs60284988 1 Conflicting interpretations of pathogenicity 2 (FunSeq)
5 (RegulomeDB)
17.77 (CADD)
c.-66C>G ND ND ND
p.Gly5Gly rs7811324 1 Benign 1.00 (Sift)
22.4 (CADD)
ND ND ND
p.Ala189Ser rs35045430 1 Benign 0.00 (Sift)
1.000 (PolyPhen-2)
13.12 (CADD)
ND ND ND
p.Ile254Val 1 0.62 (Sift)
0.939 (PolyPhen-2)
23.4 (CADD)
ND ND ND p = 0.3052
p.Ile300Leu rs111033304 3 Benign/Likely benign 0.00 (Sift)
0.972 (PolyPhen-2)
28.5 (CADD)
ND ND ND
p.Asn324Tyr rs36039758 2 Benign/Likely benign 0.01 (Sift)
0.997 (PolyPhen-2)
26.5 (CADD)
c.-66C>G ND ND ND
p.Asn382Lys 1 0.00 (Sift)
1.000 (PolyPhen-2)
31.0 (CADD)
ND ND ND p = 0.3052
p.Leu597Ser rs55638457 1 Benign/Likely benign 0.00 (Sift)
0.999 (PolyPhen-2)
29.3 (CADD)
c.35delG/c.35delG ND ND
p.Val609Gly rs17154335 5 Benign/Likely benign 0.54 (Sift)
0.000 (PolyPhen-2)
18.12 (CADD)
c.-66C>G p.Val27Ile/wt ND ND

“/wt” means the presence of a wild type allele, i.e. when the mutations were found in heterozygosis

a“n” represents the number of individuals affected by the mutation

bThe scores will differ from tool to tool. Sift: the mutations are considered as pathogenic when scores ≤ 0.05; PolyPhen-2: the amino acid substitution is considered pathogenic when scores > 0.5; CADD: the mutations are considered pathogenic when PHRED score > 20. FunSeq: scores range from 0 to 6 and as high as the most deleterious. RegulomeDB: scores range from 1a to 6, “1a” harboring the highest number of evidences for each related activity

cThe analysis of association was performed only for those three mutations. The OR values were calculated in comparison to the frequency of those mutations on the control group, using Fisher’s Exact Test. The p-values were accessed using Pearson’s Chi squared test, both performed by R Commander tool

ND no mutation detected