Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Aug 2.
Published in final edited form as: Atmos Chem Phys. 2018;18(5):3839–3864. doi: 10.5194/acp-18-3839-2018

Table 3.

Seasonal model performance for MDA8 ozone at AQS sites as measured by normalized mean bias (NMB), normalized mean error (NME), and correlation coefficient for the BASE simulations for all sites and the five analysis regions is shown in Fig. 2. The metrics were computed at each AQS site for each season, and the median metric across all sites in a given region and season is shown in this table. The fonts used in the table are based on the model evaluation goals and acceptability criteria proposed by Emery et al. (2017). Cells in normal font indicate regions and seasons where model performance meets the goal for a given metric (NMB < 5 %, NME < 15 %, and R > 0.75), cells in italics indicate regions and seasons where model performance meets the acceptability criterion but ± not the goal (5 % < NMB < 15 %, 15 % < NME < 25 %, and 0.5 < R < 0.75), and cells in bold font indicate regions and seasons where neither the goal ± nor the acceptability ± criterion are met (NMB ≥ ±15 %, NME ≥ 25 %, and R ≤ 0.5).

All NW IMW MW SE NE
NMB Spring 2.1 9.1 3.6 2.0 2.6 − 3.2
Summer 6.8 13.5 − 3.2 6.3 9.6 2.6
Fall 3.1 13.0 2.1 1.0 2.1 1.7
Winter 5.1 11.0 −2.8 23.1 7.3 28.2

NME Spring 11.3 13.1 8.5 11.3 11.3 12.0
Summer 13.6 16.2 10.5 13.3 14.7 12.0
Fall 13.5 20.8 9.4 12.1 11.7 14.4
Winter 18.8 20.5 19.2 28.8 12.0 29.1

R Spring 0.75 0.57 0.66 0.8 0.82 0.74
Summer 0.73 0.78 0.67 0.7 0.72 0.82
Fall 0.82 0.72 0.74 0.84 0.81 0.87
Winter 0.65 0.57 0.6 0.75 0.76 0.69