Skip to main content
Theranostics logoLink to Theranostics
editorial
. 2018 Jun 21;8(14):3870–3871. doi: 10.7150/thno.27810

Oxygenating the way for enhanced chemophototherapy

Wen Jiang 1, Ian Michael Delahunty 1, Jin Xie 1,2,
PMCID: PMC6071522  PMID: 30083265

Abstract

Hypoxia is behind tumor resistance in both chemotherapy and photodynamic therapy. This editorial highlights a study by Cai et al. [12] that a hemoglobin and human serum albumin hybrid protein nanoparticle can simultaneously deliver O2, chemotherapeutics, and photosensitizers to tumors for enhanced chemophototherapy.

Keywords: hypoxia, photodynamic therapy, chemotherapy, nanoparticles


The combination of chemotherapy and photodynamic therapy (PDT), or chemophototherapy (CPT), is a newly emerging concept 1, 2. On the one hand, chemotherapy can sensitize cancer cells to PDT and/or kill cancer cells that survived from incomplete PDT. On the other hand, PDT can be utilized to enhance chemotherapeutic drug (often in the form of a nanoparticle) deposition or penetration in tumors. However, the efficacy of CPT is limited by tumor hypoxia, a result of rapid oxygen consumption by cancer cells and insufficient vascular supply 1, 3, 4. Hypoxia is associated with increased resistance to chemotherapy, inducing hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF-1α) that in turn activates multi-drug resistance protein 1 (MDR1) and mediates the efflux of a wide range of chemotherapeutic drugs 5, 6. Hypoxia also affects PDT, in which toxicity is produced when a photo-activated photosensitizer transfers electrons to oxygen molecules 1.

Despite extensive research, delivering oxygen to tumors to reverse the course of hypoxia remains a challenge. Conventional methods such as hyperbaric oxygen chambers have been tested in the clinic but have shown limited benefits for tumor oxygenation 4, 7; rather, increased oxygen blood levels may cause oxygen toxicity to the lungs and the central nervous system 8. Recently, nanoparticle-based oxygen carriers 9 or generators 10, 11 have been developed and tested. Unlike conventional oxygen delivery, these nanoparticles can selectively accumulate in tumors through either active or passive targeting approaches, and then release oxygen in situ. To maximize therapeutic efficacy, it is reasoned that photosensitizers and chemotherapeutics should be loaded onto the same nanoplatform as the oxygen carrier. This brings additional requirements in design and fabrication of the nanoparticles.

A recent study by Prof. Lintao Cai and his colleagues reports a novel, hybrid protein-oxygen carrier (HPOC) approach to address this aforementioned need 12. The hybrid consists of two natural proteins, hemoglobin (Hb) and human serum albumin (HSA), which are linked together through a disulfide-bond reconfiguration strategy. Hb is the major oxygen carrier in mammals 9, 13, but has a short blood circulation half-life if administrated alone 14. Linked with HSA and assembled into a nanoparticle improves the pharmacokinetics of Hb and its accumulation in tumors. Meanwhile, HSA nanoparticles have proven to be an excellent carrier for small molecule drugs, including many types of chemotherapeutics and photosensitizers 15, 16. In this study, Cai et al. loaded oxygen (by binding with Hb), doxorubicin (DOX), and chlorin e6 (Ce6, a photosensitizer) onto the hybrid protein to form a 30 nm nanoparticle referred to as ODC-HPOC. They showed that oxygen molecules could be slowly released from the nanoparticles. Incubation with ODC-HPOC reversed cell P-glycoprotein (P-gp) upregulation under hypoxic stress. This led to reduced drug efflux, which was confirmed in a cell uptake study performed in a low oxygen chamber with ODC-HPOC, finding increased intracellular DOX and Ce6 contents relative to the control. They also observed enhanced cell killing under photoirradiation where ODC-HPOC were incubated with MCF-7 cells in a low oxygen chamber. It is expected that the same or greater treatment benefits would be seen in vivo since continuous PDT often exacerbates hypoxia.

The group also evaluated the nanoplatform in vivo in a MCF-7 xenograft model. They found improved tumor accumulation of ODC-HPOCs relative to free DOX or Ce6, which is probably attributed to the enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect. Moreover, HSA may have bound with 60-kDa glycoprotein (gp60) receptors, leading to improved nanoparticle transcytosis at tumor sites 17, 18. Once inside the tumors, oxygen is slowly released from ODC-HPOCs and populates the tumor tissues. Photoacoustic imaging found a 25% increase in HbO2 signals in tumors in ODC-HPOC injected mice, and the impact lasted for hours. The improved drug delivery, drug retention, and oxygenation led to significantly enhanced treatment outcomes. A single dose treatment caused 89.5% tumor suppression, without inducing systemic toxicity.

Hypoxia has long been a target in cancer therapy but selective oxygen delivery to tumors is non-trivial 3. Compared with inorganic nanoparticle-based oxygen suppliers 10, 11, a hemoglobin containing protein particle certainly has its advantages regarding toxicity and biodegradability. Coupling with HSA to improve the pharmacokinetics of Hb is both novel and clinically relevant. The resulting nanoparticles are function intensive but the components seem to be well integrated with minimal inter-species interference. The compact size is beneficial from delivery and tissue penetration perspectives. It is believed that the nanoplatform can be extended to other chemotherapeutics or even a group of them, which may further enhance treatment efficacy or precision.

Despite these promises, several questions need to be addressed before moving the technology forward. For instance, the nanoplatform essentially delivers three agents (oxygen, chemotherapeutic, and photosensitizer) that play different roles in the combination therapy. It is not clear what the best ratio among these agents is with regard to treatment outcomes. Moreover, it is observed that Abraxane, a paclitaxel-bound HSA nanoparticle, is rapidly disassociated in the blood circulation 17. Whether this happens to ODC-HPOCs and how this affects drug delivery and therapy remain to be investigated. Additionally, it will be interesting to explore the nanoparticles in the context of other treatment modalities such as radiochemotherapy or even immunotherapy. Overall, this highly innovative approach represents an excellent example of nanoparticle-enabled multifunctional therapeutics and should be of interest to many readers of Theranostics.

Acknowledgments

We thank the National Institutes of Health (R01EB022596 and R01NS093314), the Congressionally Directed Medical Research Program (CA140666), and the National Science Foundation (NSF1552617) for the funding support.

References

  • 1.Luo DD, Carter KA, Miranda D. et al. Chemophototherapy: An Emerging Treatment Option for Solid Tumors. Adv Sci. 2017;4:1–24. doi: 10.1002/advs.201600106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Chibber S, Farhan M, Hassan I. et al. Novel aspect of chemophototherapy in treatment of cancer. Tumor Biol. 2012;33:701–706. doi: 10.1007/s13277-011-0288-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Khoshinani HM, Afshar S, Najafi R. Hypoxia: A Double-Edged Sword in Cancer Therapy. Cancer Invest. 2016;34:536–545. doi: 10.1080/07357907.2016.1245317. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Brown JM, William WR. Exploiting tumour hypoxia in cancer treatment. Nat Rev Cancer. 2004;4:437–447. doi: 10.1038/nrc1367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Comerford KM, Wallace TJ, Karhausen J. et al. Hypoxia-inducible factor-1-dependent regulation of the multidrug resistance (MDR1) gene. Cancer Res. 2002;62:3387–3394. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Samanta D, Gilkes DM, Chaturvedi P. et al. Hypoxia-inducible factors are required for chemotherapy resistance of breast cancer stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2014;111:E5429–5438. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1421438111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
  • 7.Lu ZH, Ma JW, Liu B. et al. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy sensitizes nimustine treatment for glioma in mice. Cancer Med. 2016;5:3147–3155. doi: 10.1002/cam4.851. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Chen YL, Zhang YN, Wang ZZ. et al. Effects of adenosine metabolism in astrocytes on central nervous system oxygen toxicity. Brain Res. 2016;1635:180–189. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2016.01.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Song X, Feng L, Liang C. et al. Ultrasound Triggered Tumor Oxygenation with Oxygen-Shuttle Nanoperfluorocarbon to Overcome Hypoxia-Associated Resistance in Cancer Therapies. Nano Lett. 2016;16:6145–6153. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b02365. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Yang G, Xu L, Chao Y. et al. Hollow MnO2 as a tumor-microenvironment-responsive biodegradable nano-platform for combination therapy favoring antitumor immune responses. Nat Commun. 2017;8:902. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-01050-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Huang CC, Chia WT, Chung MF. et al. An Implantable Depot That Can Generate Oxygen in Situ for Overcoming Hypoxia-Induced Resistance to Anticancer Drugs in Chemotherapy. J Am Chem Soc. 2016;138:5222–5225. doi: 10.1021/jacs.6b01784. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Luo Z, Tian H, Liu L. et al. Tumor-targeted hybrid protein oxygen carrier to simultaneously enhance hypoxia-dampened chemotherapy and photodynamic therapy at a single dose. Theranostics. 2018;8(13):3584–3596. doi: 10.7150/thno.25409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Liu MX, Gan LH, Chen LH. et al. A novel liposome-encapsulated hemoglobin/silica nanoparticle as an oxygen carrier. Int J Pharm. 2012;427:354–357. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2012.02.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Li TH, Jing XB, Huang YB. Polymer/Hemoglobin Assemblies: Biodegradable Oxygen Carriers for Artificial Red Blood Cells. Macromol Biosci. 2011;11:865–874. doi: 10.1002/mabi.201000469. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kratz F. Albumin as a drug carrier: Design of prodrugs, drug conjugates and nanoparticles. J Control Release. 2008;132:171–183. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2008.05.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Jeong H, Huh M, Lee SJ. et al. Photosensitizer-Conjugated Human Serum Albumin Nanoparticles for Effective Photodynamic Therapy. Theranostics. 2011;1:230–239. doi: 10.7150/thno/v01p0230. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Desai N. Challenges in Development of Nanoparticle-Based Therapeutics. AAPS J. 2012;14:282–295. doi: 10.1208/s12248-012-9339-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Elsadek B, Kratz F. Impact of albumin on drug delivery-New applications on the horizon. J Control Release. 2012;157:4–28. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2011.09.069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Theranostics are provided here courtesy of Ivyspring International Publisher

RESOURCES