. 2018 Jul 30;6:e5198. doi: 10.7717/peerj.5198

Table 3. Posterior probabilities of the speciation models.

		(A) 11 models															(B) Homo vs. hetero for the best model
		n = 2					n = 4					n = 8					n = 2			n = 4			n = 8
Technique	Statistics	Scenario		PP	BF_1/2	BF_1/3	Scenario		PP	BF_1/2	BF_1/3	Scenario		PP	BF_1/2	BF_1/3	Scenario	PP	BF_1/2	Scenario	PP	BF_1/2	Scenario	PP	BF_1/2
Exome capture	jsfs = 4	PAM	Homo	0.360	1.45	1.87	PAM	Homo	0.340	1.33	1.70	PAM	Homo	0.334	1.14	2.15	Homo	0.557	1.26	Homo	0.538	1.16	Homo	0.509	1.04
	jsfs = 7	PAM	Homo	0.309	1.26	1.34	PAM	Homo	0.250	1.17	1.21	PAM	Homo	0.337	1.33	2.15	Homo	0.695	2.27	Homo	0.519	1.08	Homo	0.551	1.23
	jsfs = 23	PSC	Hetero	0.385	1.21	1.53	PSC	Hetero	0.363	1.09	1.59	PSC	Hetero	0.609	2.51	4.61	Hetero	0.990	99	Hetero	0.982	54	Hetero	1.000	NA
rna-seq	jsfs = 4	PAM	Hetero	0.227	1.14	1.60	PAM	Hetero	0.180	1.08	1.14	–	–	–	–	–	Hetero	0.556	1.25	Hetero	0.575	1.35	–	–	–
	jsfs = 7	PAM	Hetero	0.323	1.62	2.27	PAM	Hetero	0.339	1.43	2.15	–	–	–	–	–	Hetero	0.733	2.75	Homo	0.520	1.08	–	–	–
	jsfs = 23	PSC	Hetero	0.414	1.07	2.60	PSC	Hetero	0.346	1.37	1.47	–	–	–	–	–	Hetero	0.818	4.49	Hetero	0.997	323.33	–	–	–

Notes:

n: number of individuals analyzed in each species; technique: rna sequencing (“rna-seq”) vs. exome enrichment sequencing (“exome capture”); statistics: jsfs = 4 (four classes), jsfs = 7 (seven classes), jsfs = 23 (23 classes); PP: posterior probability; BF_1/2: Bayes factor defined as PP_{best model}/PP_{Second best model}; BF_1/3: Bayes factor defined as PP_{best model}/PP_{Third best model} 11 models: SI, IM hetero, IM homo, AM homo, AM hetero, PAM homo, PAM hetero, SC homo, SC hetero, PSC hetero, PSC homo. Colors match Fig. 1.