Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun 1;1(1):96–102. doi: 10.1089/heq.2016.0028

Table 1.

Comparison of Characteristics of Socioeconomically Marginalized (n=73) and Socioeconomically Privileged (n=378) Participants Who Intended to Breastfeed

Variable SEM population (n=73) SEP population (n=378)
Prenatal % of n % of n
 Mother/birthing parent age 18–25 years 47.9 2.9
 Marital status: unpartnered 34.2 0.8
 Lower than average prenatal IIFAS score (≤68.1) 53.4 38.4
 No previous breastfeeding experience 71.2 58.2
 Never breastfed as an infant 58.9 55.6
 Residence in a rural community-small towna 74.0 45.2
 Currently smoking 12.3 1.1
Peri-natal
 Cesarean section 26.0 27.8
 <1 h skin-to-skin contact after birth 68.5 64.0
 Negative first impression of breastfeeding 50.7 36.8
 Inhospital supplementation 39.7 24.6
Postnatal
 Breastfeeding cessation by 1 month 24.7 6.9
 Mixed formula and breastfeeding in first month 43.8 19.6
 Exclusively breastfed for first month 31.5 73.5
a

Rural-small town residence was calculated using the Statistics Canada Postal Code Conversation File provided by the Newfoundland and Labrador Centre for Health Information. “Rural-small town residence” includes out-of-population center (rural) and small population center (1000 to 29,999), while “Urban residence” includes large urban population center (100,000 or greater). (There are no NL communities classified as medium population centers.)

IIFAS, Iowa Infant Feeding Assessment Scale; NL, Newfoundland and Labrador; SEM, socioeconomically marginalized; SEP, socioeconomically privileged.