Table 4. In regions of a priori interest, as well as in functional ROIs, evidence was found that the same activation took place in depression and control groups.
Key Regions of Interest | Bayes Factor (Scaled JZS) | t value | uncorr. p |
---|---|---|---|
Action Emission > Action Withholding during anticipation (functional ROIs) |
> 1 is in support of no difference between Depression and Healthy groups | ||
Midbrain | 1.59 | -1.40 | 0.17 |
Supplementary Motor Area (bilat.) | 0.53 | -2.17 | 0.034 |
Left Caudate | 3.50 | -0.15 | 0.88 |
Right Caudate | 3.27 | -0.43 | 0.67 |
ROIs of interest a priori (structural) | |||
SN/VTA | 1.48 | -1.46 | 0.15 |
Ventral Striatum | 3.03 | -0.61 | 0.54 |
Action Withholding > Action Emission during anticipation (functional ROIs) |
|||
Left Parieto-Occipital | 3.52 | 0.078 | 0.94 |
Left Amygdalo-Hippocampal | 3.41 | -0.29 | 0.77 |
Right Amygdalo-Hippocampal | 3.31 | -0.39 | 0.69 |
ROIs of interest a priori (structural) | |||
SN/VTA | 3.46 | 0.21 | 0.82 |
Ventral Striatum | 3.48 | 0.18 | 0.85 |
Better > Worse than expected reward prediction error (funct. ROI) | |||
ventromedial PFC | 3.47 | 0.20 | 0.84 |
Worse > Better than expected reward prediction error (funct. ROI) | |||
right insula | 2.63 | 0.85 | 0.40 |
left insula | 3.47 | 0.20 | 0.84 |