Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Rheumatol. 2018 Apr 15;45(8):1078–1084. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.170770

Table 4.

Comparison between current study and prior CMR studies

Study Sample size DAS SJC CRP, mg/l Disease α-TNF, % Biologic, % LGE, % or units Native T1 Location
RA Control RA Control Duration RA Control
Current 59 56 3.16 1 1.7 1.7 10 49% 58% 2% 1 No diff USA
Ntusi20 39 39 3.3 - 9 1 7 0% 5% 46% 0 ↑RA UK
Holmstrom21* 31, 29 21 3.9, 3.7 8, 6 - - 0.4, 13 0% 0% 55% 0 ↑RA Finland
Kobayashi22 18 - 3.96 - 2.6 - 2.7 39% 39% 39% - - Japan
Puntmann23 24 34 >7.0 - 48.3 4.7 >10 0% 0% 10.5%** 2.3%** - UK, Germany
Kobayashi24 60 - 3.8 3 7.4 1.75 11% 40% 32% - - Japan
*

Data are presented for 31 new RA, 29 established RA starting biologic.

**

LGE assessed globally.

DAS = disease activity score. SJC = swollen joint count. CRP= C-reactive protein. Disease duration presented in median or mean years. TNF= tumor necrosis factor. LGE = late gadolinium enhancement. USA = United States of America. UK = United Kingdom.