Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Fam Psychol. 2018 Jun 21;32(5):588–598. doi: 10.1037/fam0000418

Table 4.

Summary of mediation models.

Model Indirect Effect R2 for model
Father AS T1 → Child SR T2 15.0%
 Mediator: Child PPVT T1 .097* 26.4%
 Mediator: Child EF T1 .067 18.9%
 Mediator: Father Overstim T2 .054 21.3%
Child EF T1 → Father Overstim T2 17.5%
 Mediator: Father AS T1 −.066a 24.6%
 Mediator: Father Control T1 −.096* 26.9%
 Mediator: Child SR T2 .087* 25.5%

Note: All models include income and child sex as covariates.

*

95% confidence interval for indirect effect did not include 0.

a

95% confidence interval included .001.

AS = Autonomy Support. SR = School Readiness. PPVT = Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test.