Table 1.

Characteristics of the reviewed studies on the impacts of DNM on water quantity and quality

	Study method	Number of catchments (treatment/control)	Study period (years before/after DNM)	Parameters studieda	Reference
1	Field	1/1	2/2	TOC	Åström et al. (2001a)
2	Field	1/1	2/2	Runoff, SS, TOC	Åström et al. (2001b)
3	Field	1/1	2/2	N, P	Åström et al. (2002)
4	Field	1/1	2/2	N, P	Åström et al. (2004)
5	Modeling	1/0	0/2	SS	Haahti et al. (2016)
6	Field	2/2	2–3/2	SS, N, P	Hansen et al. (2013)
7	Field/Modeling	6/0	1–3/2–4	N	Hynninen et al. (2011)
8	Field	40/0	1–2/> 20	SS	Joensuu (2013)
9	Field	37/31	1–2/1–3	SS	Joensuu et al. (1999)
10	Field	23/0	1–2/6	SS, DOC, N, P	Joensuu et al. (2001)
11	Field	40/0	1–2/2–3	SS, DOC, N, P	Joensuu et al. (2002)
12	Field	40/0	1–2/> 10	SS, DOC, N, P	Joensuu et al. (2006)
13	Modeling	2/2	6/6	Runoff	Koivusalo et al. (2008)
14	Modeling	1/0	0/2	Runoff, SS	Lappalainen et al. (2010)
17	Field	1/1	4/3	Runoff, SS, N, P	Manninen (1995)
18	Field	1/1	4/3	Runoff, SS, N, P	Manninen (1998)
19	Field	1/0	0/3	Runoff, SS	Marttila and Kløve (2010a)
20	Field	1/0	0/3	Runoff, SS, N, P	Marttila and Kløve (2010b)
21	Field/Modeling	9/8	1–3/2–4	SS, N, P	Nieminen et al. (2010)
22	Field	2/1	4–5/2	Runoff, SS	Stenberg et al. (2015)
23	Field	2/2	0.15/2	Runoff, SS	Tuukkanen et al. (2016)

^aParameters reported in the publications other than runoff, SS, TOC/DOC, N, and P are not mentioned here. N and P may involve their different species, such as total (unfiltered) and dissolved forms, as well as organic and inorganic species