Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 23;9(15):2702–2712. doi: 10.7150/jca.25646

Table 3.

Univariate and multivariate regression analysis of relationships between lymph node metastasis and clinicopathological factors, subgroup classification

a. b.
Variables Univariate regression Multivariate regression
OR 95% CI P value OR 95% CI P value
Sex Men vs Women 1.341 0.5657-3.1784 0.5052 2.9363 0.8322-10.3605 0.094
Age (year) 1.0547 1.0095-1.1019 0.0136 1.042 0.9807-1.1072 0.0857
Size (mm) 1.0147 0.9827-1.0564 0.3954 1.0082 1.0654-0.9918 0.1769
Site Right vs Left 3.7959 1.3130-13.8392 0.0123 4.4896 0.7479-26.9502 0.1005
Microscopic type I vs IIc 0.1041 0.01239-0.8743 0.0372 0.2629 0.01839-3.7578 0.3249
IIc vs IIa+IIc 8.5000 0.9708-72.4243 0.0532 3.3592 0.2519-44.7973 0.3593
Histologic type WDA vs MDA 3.000 0.9357-9.6181 0.0016 5.3146 0.8776-32.1840 0.0691
pSM depth pSM1 vs pSM2 2.589 0.4318-49.5508 0.3342 1.9859 0.1449-27.2242 0.6075
Lymph vessel invasion Low vs High 4.680 0.73954-29.6163 0.1011 2.2791 0.1327-39.1316 0.5701
Venous invasion Low vs High 2.280 0.47736-10.8900 0.3016 1.779 0.0233-13.5495 0.7227
Tumor budding Grade 1 vs 2 1.4444 0.3348-9,9812 0.6453 7.4263 0.4455-123.7920 0.1625
Subgroup Subgroup 1 vs 2 6.000 1.1717-30.7246 0.0315 4.7729 0.4148-54.9239 0.2099
Subgroup 3 vs 2 4.3125 1.1644-15.9717 0.0287 5.9167 0.8423-41.5633 0.0739
Subgroup 4 vs 2 7.3125 2.0273-26.3760 0.0024 15.2232 2.2060-105.0544 0.0057

Macroscopic type: I, protruded type; IIa, flat elevated type; IIc, flat depressed type; LST, laterally spreading tumor; WDA, well-differentiated adenocarcinoma; MDA, moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma; PAP, papillary adenocarcinoma; POR, poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma.